Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 7;39(3):1187–1206. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23909

Table 4.

Results at three example voxelsa shown in Figure 4

ICC(2,1) ICC(3,1) Session effect
Voxel Model Value
F24,24
p value Value
F24,24
p value Value t 24 p value
V 1* ANOVA 0.530 3.300 0.0024 0.530 3.300 0.0024
LME 0.531 3.292 0.0025 0.534 3.292 0.0025 0.012 1.144 0.26
RME 0.500 3.578 0.0014 0.552 3.468 0.0017 0.012 1.159 0.26
MME 0.504 3.033 0.0043 0.504 3.030 0.0043 0.008 0.786 0.44
RMME 0.529 3.246 0.0027 0.527 3.231 0.0028 0.008 0.789 0.44
V 2 ANOVA −0.270 0.560 0.920 −0.280 0.560 0.920
LME 0 1 0.5 0 1 0.5 0.073 1.469 0.15
RME 0.044 1.126 0.39 0.058 1.123 0.39 0.073 1.499 0.15
MME 0.470 4.464 2.5e‐4 0.631 4.422 2.7e‐4 0.091 4.876 5.7e‐5
RMME 0.652 4.744 1.5e‐4 0.649 4.693 1.7e‐4 0.091 4.878 5.7e‐5
V 3 ANOVA 0.570 4.800 1.4e‐4 0.660 4.800 1.4e‐4
LME 0.574 4.819 1.4e‐4 0.656 4.819 1.4e‐4 0.080 3.372 0.0025
RME 0.509 5.072 8.9e‐5 0.665 4.970 1.1e‐4 0.080 3.398 0.0023
MME 0.743 13.851 5.8e‐9 0.864 13.748 6.3e‐9 0.076 5.52 1.1e‐5
RMME 0.870 14.435 3.8e‐9 0.870 14.344 4.0e‐9 0.076 5.517 1.1e‐5
a

The locations for the three voxels are the following (coordinates are in mm in TT space): V 1: (39, 64, −6) in right middle occipital gyrus; V 2: (11, 88, −11) in right lingual gyrus; V 3: (11, 86, −6) in right lingual gyrus. Any fixed effects such as session difference here can be easily estimated through any of the four mixed‐effects models for ICC(3,1), but they are usually not provided through ANOVA.