Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug 9;99(3):423–432. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.033

Table 3.

Multivariate Linear Regression Models of RT Outcomes Compared to Control.

RT vs Control+ Cervical vs Thoracic+ AIS A vs AIS CD+ AIS B vs AIS CD+ Adjusted R2
FVC (%) 10 (3) ** 0 (7) 3 (1) 0 (4) 0.49
FEV1 (%) 8 (2) ** 0 (6) 2 (1) 0 (3) 0.54
BS (ms/mmHg) During 5s MEP
Phase II 1.24 (0.4) * 0.33 (0.4) 1.09 (0.5) 0.13 (0.6) 0.45
Phase IV 1.47 (0.5) ** 1.47 (0.5) ** −0.17 (0.4) 0.55 (0.7) 0.57
Power Spectral Density
Low Frequency R-R Interval
Minutes 5–10 122 (113) −173 (116) 20 (128) 157 (155) 0.17
Minutes 10–15 206 (73) ** −56 (76) 62 (82) 389 (102) 0.46
High Frequency R-R Interval
Minutes 5–10 80 (57) 27 (51) −21 (68) 62 (79) 0.08
Minutes 10–15 114 (50) * −17 (51) −14 (55) 106 (70) 0.23

Reference factor for independent variables are marked with (+). Results are reported as beta coefficient (standard error);

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01. RT: respiratory training; FVC: forced vital capacity; FEV 1: forced expiratory volume in one second;

BS: baroreflex sensitivity; MEP: maximum expiratory pressure generation.