Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 9;8:2783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20070-4

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effect of isoxaben, a cell wall synthesis inhibitor, on OsMMP1-expressing tobacco and OsMMP1 down-regulated rice plants. (a) Photograph exhibits the stunted growth of control (Cont) tobacco plants compared to transgenic (Trans) plants upon 1 nM isoxaben treatment (+iso). Scale bar = 25 mm. (bI) Micrographs show the stem diameter is increased significantly in the control tobacco plant compared with the transgenic lines upon isoxaben treatment (+iso). Scale bar = 300 µm. (bII) Comparison of stem diameter in control and transgenic tobacco plants with (+iso) and without (−iso) isoxaben treatment. (cI) Micrographs show the cell size is increased in control tobacco plant compared with the transgenic plant upon isoxaben treatment (+iso). Scale bar = 100 µm. (cII) Comparison of cell area (in µm2) in control and transgenic tobacco plants with (+iso) and without (−iso) isoxaben treatment. (dI) Photograph exhibits shorter shoot length in RNAi transgenic rice lines compared to the control upon 20 nM isoxaben treatment (+iso). Scale bar = 20 mm. (dII) Comparison of shoot length in control and transgenic rice plants with (+iso) and without (−iso) of isoxaben treatment. In all bar graphs, data are expressed as mean ± SE of 15 observations (each transgenic line) for (bII); as mean ± SE of 20 observations (each transgenic line) for (cII); as mean ± SE of 4 observations (each transgenic line) for (dII). Data are subjected to Student’s t-test: ***P < 0.001 for (bII) and (cII); *P < 0.05 for (dII). There is no significant difference between non-treated (−iso) control and transgenic. ns, not significant. Bright field micrographs of bI and cI were taken using Nikon ECLIPSE 50i upright microscope, and images were analysed with NLS-Elements D 3.2 software.