Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 5;9:13. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00013

Table 4.

Outputs of different linear mixed model testing the effects of time and zone (touristic or control) on freezing intensity for both trial [model (i)] and at each trial [model (ii), model (iii)].

Model Freezing Intensity ~ Zone + Time + (1|Trial/Aquarium)
(i) June + August Random effects
Groups Name Variance Std. Dev. n
Aquarium:Trial (lntercept) 249.8 15.8 20
SES (lntercept) 537.7 23.2 2
Residual 241.4 15.5
Number of observations: 100
Fixed effects
Estimate Std error t-value p-value
(Intercept) 107.2 17.61 6.1 0.077 .
Zone:Touristic −19.4 7.7 −2.5 0.02 *
Time −0.9 1.1 −0.8 0.4
Freezing Intensity ~ Zone + Time + (1|Aquarium)
(ii) June Random effects
Groups Name Variance Std. Dev. n
Aquarium (Intercept) 78.24 8.845 8
Residual 129.83 11.394
Number of observations: 40
Fixed effects
Estimate Std error t-value p-value
(Intercept) 94.18 6.4 14.8 <0.0001 ***
Zone:Touristic −22.3 7.2 −3.1 0.02 *
Time −1.75 1.3 −1.38 0.18
Freezing Intensity ~ Zone + Time + (1|Aquarium)
(iii) August Random effects
Groups Name Variance Std. Dev. n
Aquarium (Intercept) 377.8 19.4 12
Residual 318.2 17.8
Number of observation: 60
Fixed effects
Estimate Std error t-value p-value
(Intercept) 121.2 9.87 12.28 <0.0001 ***
Zone:Touristic −17.43 12.13 −1.44 0.18
Time −0.34 1.63 −0.21 0.84

Models with additive terms (zone + time) and interaction between terms (zone x time) were first compared using the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) so that the most parsimonious model was conserved.

***

< 0.001,

*

< 0.05.