Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 9;19:36. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0821-9

Table 1.

Summary of longitudinal publications meeting inclusion criteria and included in the systematic literature review

Author Study name Publication year Overall sample size (n) Sample size of smallest sub-group (n) Mean follow-up (years) Country Overall quality assessment score (%)a,b
Afghahi et al. [22] Swedish National Diabetes Register 2010 3667 407 5 Sweden 18 (67%)
Afkarian et al. [9] NHANES III 2013 1430 658 10 USA 17 (63%)
Al Suleiman et al. [77] N/A 2008 35 N/A 8 Saudi Arabia 16 (59%)
Altemtam et al. [23] N/A 2011 270 94 5.2 UK 13 (48%)
Alwakeel et al. [44] N/A 2011 621 166 10 Saudi Arabia 12 (44%)
Andresdottir et al. [10] N/A 2014 543 286 5.7 Denmark 15 (56%)
Araki et al. [49] Japanese Elderly Diabetes Intervention Trial 2012 621 306 4.3 Japan 15 (56%)
Azubike et al. [56] N/A 2013 22 N/A 12 Nigeria 15 (56%)
Bentata et al. [24] N/A 2014 144 26 4.1 Morocco 13 (48%)
Berhane et al. [25] N/A 2011 2420 1503 10.2 USA 15 (56%)
Bruno et al. [26] Casale Monferrato Study 2007 1538 21 11 Italy 19 (70%)
Chen et al. [27] N/A 2012 487 65 6.6 Taiwan 16 (59%)
Cox et al. [28] Diabetes Heart Study 2013 1220 N/A 8.2 USA 17 (63%)
De Cosmo et al. [8] N/A 2015 13,964 2540 4 Italy 20 (74%)
de Hauteclocque et al. [37] SURDIAGENE 2014 1146 486 5.7 France 19 (70%)
Dunkler et al. [29] ONTARGET and ORIGIN 2015 15,066 6766 5.5 Multinational 15 (56%)
Elley et al. [38] New Zealand Diabetes Cohort Study 2013 31,613 5877 7.3 New Zealand 16 (59%)
Jardine et al. [39] ADVANCE 2012 11,140 7377 4.8 Multinational 19 (70%)
Kitai et al. [30] N/A 2015 125 22 75 days Japan 20 (74%)
Lambers Heerspink et al. [50] RENAAL 2010 701 N/A 3.4 Multinational 16 (59%)
Monseu et al. [40] SURDIAGENE 2015 1371 411 4.8 France 15 (56%)
Moriya et al. [54] N/A 2012 30 9 6.2 Japan 14 (52%)
Murussi et al. [31] N/A 2007 173 41 8 Brazil 17 (63%)
Packham et al. [11] N/A 2012 3228 N/A 2.8 Multinational 19 (70%)
Pavkov et al. [12] N/A 2008 983 N/A 8.4 USA 17 (63%)
Pavkov et al. [45] N/A 2012 195 88 4 USA 15 (56%)
Pavkov et al. [41] N/A 2013 234 76 10.7 USA 16 (59%)
Retnakaran et al. [13] UKPDS 2006 9063 4031 15 UK 17 (63%)
Sinkeler et al. [42] RENAAL and IDNT 2013 1872 623 3 Multinational 14 (52%)
Stoycheff et al. [52] IDNT 2009 1608 693 2.6 Multinational 14 (52%)
Takagi et al. [46] N/A 2015 1802 1655 6.9 Japan 18 (67%)
Tanaka et al. [47] N/A 2015 3231 137 5.9 Japan 19 (70%)
Targher et al. [32] Verona Diabetes Study 2011 2823 38 5.7 Italy 19 (70%)
Unsal et al. [33] N/A 2012 122 35 3.3 Turkey 15 (56%)
Viana et al. [34] N/A 2012 199 86 6.1 Brazil 15 (56%)
Vupputuri et al. [35] N/A 2011 10,290 52 3.1 USA 17 (63%)
Wada et al. [48] N/A 2013 4328 534 7 Japan 19 (70%)
Yang et al. [36] Hong Kong Diabetes Registry 2006 4438 159 2.9 Hong Kong 19 (70%)
Yokoyama et al. [53] JDDM 2011 2954 175 3.8 Japan 16 (59%)
Yokoyama et al. [55] N/A 2012 211 28 4.5 Japan 18 (67%)
Yokoyama et al. [51] N/A 2013 1002 303 3.8 Japan 16 (59%)
Zoppini et al. [43] Verona Diabetes Study 2012 1682 263 10 Italy 19 (70%)

NHANES III Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, SURDIAGENE Survie, Diabete de type 2 et Genetique Study, ONTARGET Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial, ORIGIN Outcome Reduction With Initial Glargine Intervention Trial, ADVANCE Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation Study, RENAAL Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan Study, UKPDS UK Prospective Diabetes Study, IDNT Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial, JDDM Japan Diabetes Clinical Data Management Study

aScored using the Downs and Black quality assessment instrument [21]

bProportional score was calculated by dividing each study’s overall quality assessment score by the sum of points available in the Downs and Black instrument