Skip to main content
. 2016 May;11(1):17–26. doi: 10.15420/icr.2016:7:2

Table 3: Summary of Results From the FAME Study.

Year Patients (n) Participants Endpoints FFR cut-off value Adenosine Mean FFR Treatment Endpoints P value
FFR-guided group Angio-guided group RR with FFR guidance (95 % CI)
2009 1,005 Stable angina (or ACS if >5 days post event) Multi-vessel disease referred for PCI Death, MI or repeat revascularisation FFR ≤0.80 Central IV (140 μg/kg/min) Overall cohort: 0.71 ±0.18 Ischaemic lesions: 0.60±0.14 Non-ischaemic lesions: 0.88±0.05 Angio-guided versus FFR-guided PCI (DES) 13.2 18.3 0.72 (0.54–0.96) 0.02

ACS = acute coronary syndrome; DES = drug-eluting stent; FAME = Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation; FFR = fractional flow reserve; IV = intravenous; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention. Source: Tonino, et al. 2009.