Table 5: Summary of Results From the FAME-2 Study.
Year | Patients (n) | Participants | Endpoints | FFR cut-off value | Adenosine | Mean FFR | Treatment | Follow-up duration | Endpoints | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCI + OMT (%) | OMT only (%) | ||||||||||
2012 | 888 out Of 1,220 enrolled | Stable angina ACS (if >5 days post event), Patients considered for PCI | Death, MI, repeat revascularisation | FFR ≤0.80 | Standard practice (IV (140 μg/kg/min) or IC (50 μg) | In lesions with FFR ≤0.80: 0.64±0.13 (range 0.19–0.80) FFR-guided PCI + OMT group: 0.68±0.10 OMT alone: 0.68±0.15 | FFR-guided PCI (DES) + OMT versus OMT alone: | 213±128 days (PCI + OMT) 214±127 days (OMT) 206±119 days (Registry group) | 4.3 | 12.7 | <0.001 |
2014* | As above | As above | As above | As above | As above | As above | As above | 2 years | 8.1 % | 19.5 % | <0.001 |
ACS = acute coronary syndrome; DES = drug-eluting stent; FAME = Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation; FFR = fractional flow reserve; IC = intracoronary; IV = intravenous; OMT = optimal medical therapy; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention. Sources: De Bruyne, et al. 2012; 2014. *Primary endpoint of the FAME-2 study.