Table 7: Sub-group Analysis of Patients who Underwent Urgent Revascularisation in the FAME-2 Study.
| Patients (n [%]) | Randomly assigned groups (n [%]) | P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCI + OMT (n=447) | OMT alone (n=441) | Hazard ratio with PCI (95 % CI) | |||
| Total | 56 (100) | 7 (1.6) | 49 (11.1) | 0.13 (0.06–0.30) | <0.001 |
| Ml | 12 (21.4) | ||||
| Unstable angina + ischaemia on ECG | 15 (26.8) | 4 (0.9) | 23 (5.2) | 0.13 (0.04–0.43) | <0.001 |
| Unstable angina diagnosed based on clinical features | 29 (51.8) | – | – | – | – |
ECG = electrocardiogram; FAME = Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation; MI = myocardial infarction. OMT = optimal medical therapy; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention. Source: De Bruyne, et al. 2012.