Table 2.
Triodia species | Dormancy state | Ψ b95 [MPa] | Ψ b50 [MPa] | Ψ b5 [MPa] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Triodia basedowii | Florets | 0.0 ± 0.0 | −0.01 ± 0.01 | −0.05 ± 0.01 |
Seeds | −0.1 ± 0.01 t= 6.31*** | −0.24 ± 0.01 t= 6.31*** | −0.49 ± 0.05 t= 6.31*** | |
Triodia epactia | Florets | −0.14 ± 0.03 | −0.27 ± 0.01 | −0.36 ± 0.04 |
WD Florets | −0.12 ± 0.03t=−0.21 | −0.30 ± 0.02t=−1.06*** | −0.39 ± 0.07t=0.65 | |
Seeds | −0.11 ± 0.01t=0.66 | −0.44 ± 0.01t=−3.04*** | −0.88 ± 0.1t=-7.14*** | |
Triodia lanigera | Florets | −0.04 ± 0.03 | −0.18 ± 0.03 | −0.32 ± 0.07 |
Seeds | −0.03 ± 0.01t=0.19 | −0.24 ± 0.02t=−1.21 | −0.49 ± 0.06t=2.20*** | |
Triodia pungens | Florets | −0.12 ± 0.02 | −0.24 ± 0.01 | −0.36 ± 0.04 |
WD Florets | −0.13 ± 0.02t=−0.21 | −0.27 ± 0.01t=−1.06*** | −0.40 ± 0.04t=-0.65 | |
Seeds | −0.11 ± 0.01t=0.34 | −0.37 ± 0.01t=−6.78*** | −0.73 ± 0.06t=-8.01*** | |
Triodia sp. Shovelanna Hill | Florets | 0.0 ± 0.0 | −0.01 ± 0.01 | −0.1 ± 0.1 |
Seeds | 0.0 ± 0.0t=0.03 | −0.18 ± 0.02t=−5.81*** | −0.4 ± 0.05t=-6.91*** | |
Triodia wiseana | Florets | −0.09 ± 0.02 | −0.23 ± 0.01 | −0.38 ± 0.03 |
WD Florets | −0.07 ± 0.03t=0.5 | −0.26 ± 0.03t=2.59 | −0.41 ± 0.03t=−0.46 | |
Seeds | −0.07 ± 0.01t=0.73 | −0.41 ± 0.01t=−5.06*** | −0.78 ± 0.07t=−8.32*** |
Untreated, WD florets and cleaned seeds were plated onto Petri dishes containing different PEG solutions simulating moisture stress. Experimental responses in T. basedowii, T. lanigera and T. sp Shovelanna Hill were omitted due to lack of germination following wet/dry cycling.
Water potentials were calculated from a three-parameter Weibull function for germination data across water potentials.
Summary statistics (t-statistics and P-values) are shown for WD florets and cleaned seeds for comparison with untreated florets only. Asterisks show the significance level at P < 0.001 (***).