Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 27;121(2):367–375. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx158

Table 2.

Water potential thresholds describing the maximum (Ψb95), median (Ψb50) and minimum (Ψb5) (mean ± s.e., n = 4) responses of untreated florets, wet/dry-cycled (WD) florets and cleaned seeds in Triodia

Triodia species Dormancy state Ψ b95 [MPa] Ψ b50 [MPa] Ψ b5 [MPa]
Triodia basedowii Florets 0.0 ± 0.0 −0.01 ± 0.01 −0.05 ± 0.01
Seeds −0.1 ± 0.01 t= 6.31*** −0.24 ± 0.01 t= 6.31*** −0.49 ± 0.05 t= 6.31***
Triodia epactia Florets −0.14 ± 0.03 −0.27 ± 0.01 −0.36 ± 0.04
WD Florets −0.12 ± 0.03t=−0.21 −0.30 ± 0.02t=−1.06*** −0.39 ± 0.07t=0.65
Seeds −0.11 ± 0.01t=0.66 −0.44 ± 0.01t=−3.04*** −0.88 ± 0.1t=-7.14***
Triodia lanigera Florets −0.04 ± 0.03 −0.18 ± 0.03 −0.32 ± 0.07
Seeds −0.03 ± 0.01t=0.19 −0.24 ± 0.02t=−1.21 −0.49 ± 0.06t=2.20***
Triodia pungens Florets −0.12 ± 0.02 −0.24 ± 0.01 −0.36 ± 0.04
WD Florets −0.13 ± 0.02t=−0.21 −0.27 ± 0.01t=−1.06*** −0.40 ± 0.04t=-0.65
Seeds −0.11 ± 0.01t=0.34 −0.37 ± 0.01t=−6.78*** −0.73 ± 0.06t=-8.01***
Triodia sp. Shovelanna Hill Florets 0.0 ± 0.0 −0.01 ± 0.01 −0.1 ± 0.1
Seeds 0.0 ± 0.0t=0.03 −0.18 ± 0.02t=−5.81*** −0.4 ± 0.05t=-6.91***
Triodia wiseana Florets −0.09 ± 0.02 −0.23 ± 0.01 −0.38 ± 0.03
WD Florets −0.07 ± 0.03t=0.5 −0.26 ± 0.03t=2.59 −0.41 ± 0.03t=−0.46
Seeds −0.07 ± 0.01t=0.73 −0.41 ± 0.01t=−5.06*** −0.78 ± 0.07t=−8.32***

Untreated, WD florets and cleaned seeds were plated onto Petri dishes containing different PEG solutions simulating moisture stress. Experimental responses in T. basedowii, T. lanigera and T. sp Shovelanna Hill were omitted due to lack of germination following wet/dry cycling.

Water potentials were calculated from a three-parameter Weibull function for germination data across water potentials.

Summary statistics (t-statistics and P-values) are shown for WD florets and cleaned seeds for comparison with untreated florets only. Asterisks show the significance level at P < 0.001 (***).