Table 1.

Endothelial tube parameters estimated under different experimental and theoretical schema (best fit ± 95% confidence interval).

Data source	Fitting	λ (mm)	ra (MΩ/mm)	rm (MΩ·mm)	Rm (GΩ)	Rgj (MΩ)
Control experiment	1-dim. inf. cable[1] x−xstim≥50μm	1.38±0.08			10.6
	1-dim. short cable[2] x−xstim≥50μm	1.16±0.12*	10.7±1.9	14.5±1.0†	11.6±0.8‡	5.2±0.9§
	1-dim. short cable[2] x−xstim≥500μm	1.14±0.33	11.3±7.6	14.6±2.5	11.7±2.0	5.5±3.7
	2-dim. short cable x−xstim≥50μm				11.2±1.1	4.5±0.9
	Discrete model[3]				11.9	4.5
Discrete model (Rm = 11.9 GΩ, Rgj = 4.5 MΩ)	1-dim. short cable[4] x−xstim≥50μm	1.17	10.6	14.5	11.6	5.2
	1-dim. short cable[4] x−xstim≥500μm	1.23	9.5	14.2	11.4	4.6
	2-dim. short cable x−xstim≥50μm				11.3	4.4
NS309 experiment	1-dim. inf. cable x−xstim≥50μm	0.85±0.06			4.0[5]
	1-dim. short cable x−xstim≥50μm	0.78±0.05*	8.8±1	5.3±0.3†	4.2±0.2‡	4.3±0.5§
	1-dim. short cable x−xstim≥500μm	0.78±0.12	8.6±3.5	5.3±0.8	4.2±0.6	4.2±1.7
	2-dim. short cable x−xstim≥50μm				4.0±0.3	3.5±0.6
ACh experiment	1-dim. inf. cable x−xstim=500μm	0.61 (55% drop)			2.1[6] (80% drop)

^[1]– Eqs. 6 and 8.

^[2]– Eqs. 10, 12–14.

^[3]– R_m and R_gj in discrete model (Fig. 1).

^[4]– Eqs. 10, 12–14 fitting discrete model.

^[5]– R_m′ = (λ ′/λ)² × R_m = (0.85mm/1.38mm)² × 10.6 GΩ

^[6]– R_m′ = (λ ′/λ)² × R_m = (0.61mm/1.38mm)² × 10.6 GΩ

^*– significantly different (P < 0.003)

^{†, ‡}– significantly different (P < 10⁻⁶)

^§– significantly different (P < 0.038)