Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Aug 10;5(2):186–191. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.07.007

Table 2.

Finnish screening arm had greater risk for high-risk prostate cancer. Risk groups were defined as follows: low risk was defined as stage T1–T2 with a Gleason score ≤6, M0 and N0. A moderate-risk PC was stage T1–T2 with a Gleason score 7, or T3 with a Gleason score ≤7, both with M0 and N0. High-risk PCs were either stage T1–T3 with a Gleason score 8–10, or stage T4 or M1 or N1 (with any Gleason score)

Screen detected PCs Finland Sweden
Total Per 1000 person years Total Per 1000 person years HR CI 95%
Low risk 1139 3.14 452 5.93 0.62 0.55–0.69
Moderate risk 351 0.97 93 1.22 0.98 0.78–1.23
High risk 134 0.37 21 0.28 1.65 1.04–2.61
Interval PCs

Low risk 473 1.31 52 0.68 2.60 1.96–3.47
Moderate risk 259 0.71 27 0.35 3.01 2.01–4.47
High risk 137 0.39 16 0.21 2.56 1.52–4.32
Total detected PCs (inc. non-attenders)

Low risk 1795 4.95 525 6.89 0.88 0.80–9.80
Moderate risk 761 2.10 136 1.78 1.60 1.34–1.93
High risk 405 1.11 61 0.80 1.93 1.47–2.52