Table 3.

p Values of the ANOVAs and pairwise comparisons for within-participant analysis in ROIs of individual participants

Participant		S1	S2	S3	S4	S5	S6	S7	Direction of effect (number of participants showing an effect)
Number of runs		3	4	3	4	4	4	4
Ventral/dorsal ROIs × orientation × visibility	Stream	0.190	0.002*	0.066*	0.027*	0.346	0.024*	0.011*	Ventral > dorsal (3)Dorsal > ventral (1)
	Orientation	0.742	0.515	0.257	0.990	0.429	0.084	0.746
	Visibility	0.049*	0.089	0.100	0.011*	0.005*	0.00003*	0.045*	Visible> invisible (5)
	Stream × orientation	0.541	0.010*	0.878	0.581	0.010*	0.010*	0.307	(3)
	Stream × visibility	0.022*	0.002*	0.018*	0.002*	0.002*	0.0003*	0.001*	(7)
	Stream × orientation × visibility	0.337	0.050	0.300	0.632	0.008*	0.374	0.591	(1)(trend 1)
Individual ROIs
FBA	Orientation	0.211	0.459	0.141	0.304	0.730	0.970	0.757
	Visibility	0.024*	0.146	0.018*	0.0004*	0.010*	0.00005*	0.015*	Visible > invisible (6)
	Orientation × visibility	0.365	0.843	0.854	0.217	0.719	0.261	0.886
EBA	Orientation	0.114	0.141	0.060	0.383	0.107	0.755	0.542
	Visibility	0.053	0.012*	0.034*	0.005*	0.004*	0.00008*	0.009*	Visible > invisible (6) (trend 1)
	Orientation × visibility	0.323	0.544	0.035*	0.527	0.162	0.541	0.729	(1)
pIPS	Orientation	0.974	0.714	0.491	0.260	0.466	0.004*	0.760	Inverted > upright (1)
	Visibility	0.047*	0.618	0.390	0.525	0.857	0.005*	0.193	visible > invisible (2)
	Orientation × visibility	0.975	0.032*	0.783	0.099	0.129	0.169	0.267	(1)
mIPS	Orientation	0.898	0.952	0.964	0.803	0.950	0.003*	0.972	Inverted > upright (1)
	Visibility	0.147	0.444	0.870	0.203	0.692	0.027*	0.425	Invisible > visible (1)
	Orientation × visibility	0.894	0.089	0.849	0.654	0.011*	0.025*	0.685	(2)
aIPS	Orientation	0.551	0.532	0.028*	0.385	0.804	0.131		Upright > inverted (1)
	Visibility	0.029*	0.968	0.391	0.201	0.169	0.038*		Visible > invisible (2)
	Orientation × visibility	0.916	0.453	0.987	0.970	0.468	0.583
V1	Orientation	0.315	0.350	0.887	0.740	0.712	0.267	0.707
	Visibility	0.075	0.106	0.101	0.252	0.014*	0.556	0.091	Invisible > visible (1)
	Orientation × visibility	0.866	0.351	0.674	0.130	0.374	0.285	0.702
Pairwise comparison of upright visible and upright invisible	Ventral	0.031*	0.020*	0.033*	0.083	0.005*	0.008*	0.033*	Upright visible > upright invisible(6)
	Dorsal	0.131	0.360	0.830	0.894	0.068	0.739	0.581
	FBA	0.012*	0.105	0.034*	0.061	0.035*	0.004*	0.036*	Upright visible > upright invisible(5)
	EBA	0.041*	0.014*	0.033*	0.095	0.007*	0.014*	0.036*	Upright visible > upright invisible(6)
	pIPS	0.016*	0.115	0.625	0.176	0.189	0.171	0.458	Upright visible > upright invisible(1)
	mIPS	0.168	0.119	0.955	0.760	0.043*	0.003*	0.646	Upright invisible > upright visible(2)
	aIPS	0.309	0.527	0.765	0.417	0.512	0.470
	V1	0.189	0.416	0.004*	0.183	0.103	0.751	0.842	Upright visible > upright invisible(1)

The inputs were parameter estimates (percentage signal changes) of GLM per run per condition. Significant results are indicated with *.