Table 4.
Regression analysis with health promotion gap as the dependent variables
Model | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | t | Significance | 95.0% CI for b | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | Beta | Lower bound | Upper bound | |||
Constant | 12.878 | 12.153 | 1.060 | 0.290 | −10.987 | 36.744 | |
Gender | −0.256 | 0.167 | −0.060 | −1.536 | 0.125 | −0.583 | 0.071 |
Year of birth | −0.004 | 0.006 | −0.031 | −0.711 | 0.478 | −0.017 | 0.008 |
Marital status | −0.146 | 0.220 | −0.028 | −0.665 | 0.506 | −0.578 | 0.285 |
Ethnicity | 0.161 | 0.272 | 0.025 | 0.593 | 0.553 | −0.373 | 0.695 |
Religiosity | 0.106 | 0.236 | 0.019 | 0.452 | 0.652 | −0.356 | 0.569 |
Number of children | −0.020 | 0.056 | −0.016 | −0.347 | 0.729 | −0.130 | 0.091 |
Health status | 0.144 | 0.090 | 0.065 | 1.596 | 0.111 | −0.033 | 0.321 |
Satisfaction from health‐care fund | −0.674 | 0.084 | −0.303 | −8.045 | 0.000 | −0.839 | −0.510 |
Maccabi vs. Klalit Health‐care Fund | −0.138 | 0.188 | −0.030 | −0.734 | 0.463 | −0.508 | 0.231 |
Meuhedet vs. Klalit Health‐care Fund | 0.114 | 0.267 | 0.017 | 0.428 | 0.669 | −0.410 | 0.639 |
Leumit vs. Klalit Health‐care Fund | 0.438 | 0.308 | 0.055 | 1.421 | 0.156 | −0.167 | 1.043 |
Additional insurance in health‐care fund | 0.095 | 0.239 | 0.019 | 0.397 | 0.691 | −0.375 | 0.565 |
Private insurance | 0.397 | 0.364 | 0.050 | 1.091 | 0.276 | −0.318 | 1.111 |
Income | −0.093 | 0.040 | −0.111 | −2.314 | 0.021 | −0.172 | −0.014 |
Education | −0.081 | 0.067 | −0.051 | −1.199 | 0.231 | −0.213 | 0.052 |
Periphery vs. centre | −0.053 | 0.170 | −0.012 | −0.309 | 0.757 | −0.387 | 0.282 |
N = 656; R 2 = 0.12.