Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 2;18(6):2638–2650. doi: 10.1111/hex.12238

Table 4.

Regression analysis with health promotion gap as the dependent variables

Model Unstandardized coefficients Standardized coefficients t Significance 95.0% CI for b
b SE Beta Lower bound Upper bound
Constant 12.878 12.153 1.060 0.290 −10.987 36.744
Gender −0.256 0.167 −0.060 −1.536 0.125 −0.583 0.071
Year of birth −0.004 0.006 −0.031 −0.711 0.478 −0.017 0.008
Marital status −0.146 0.220 −0.028 −0.665 0.506 −0.578 0.285
Ethnicity 0.161 0.272 0.025 0.593 0.553 −0.373 0.695
Religiosity 0.106 0.236 0.019 0.452 0.652 −0.356 0.569
Number of children −0.020 0.056 −0.016 −0.347 0.729 −0.130 0.091
Health status 0.144 0.090 0.065 1.596 0.111 −0.033 0.321
Satisfaction from health‐care fund −0.674 0.084 −0.303 −8.045 0.000 −0.839 −0.510
Maccabi vs. Klalit Health‐care Fund −0.138 0.188 −0.030 −0.734 0.463 −0.508 0.231
Meuhedet vs. Klalit Health‐care Fund 0.114 0.267 0.017 0.428 0.669 −0.410 0.639
Leumit vs. Klalit Health‐care Fund 0.438 0.308 0.055 1.421 0.156 −0.167 1.043
Additional insurance in health‐care fund 0.095 0.239 0.019 0.397 0.691 −0.375 0.565
Private insurance 0.397 0.364 0.050 1.091 0.276 −0.318 1.111
Income −0.093 0.040 −0.111 −2.314 0.021 −0.172 −0.014
Education −0.081 0.067 −0.051 −1.199 0.231 −0.213 0.052
Periphery vs. centre −0.053 0.170 −0.012 −0.309 0.757 −0.387 0.282

N = 656; R 2  = 0.12.