Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 1;6(2):1370–1378. doi: 10.1039/c4sc02971b

Table 2. Simulated and experimental structural and thermodynamic properties of it-/st-PMMA stereocomplex crystals of Right Down (RD), Right Down/Right Up (RD/RU), Right Down/Left Down (RD/LD) and Right Down/Left Up (RD/LU) packing motifs.

Description Packing motif Density (g cm–3) Helical pitch st-PMMA (nm) Cohesive energy density (J cm–3) Chain width (nm) Sum of differences a (nm)
Experiment 1.215 (ref. 45) 0.92 ± 0.02 (ref. 24) 361 b
91-it/181-st RD 1.240 ± 0.001 0.97 ± 0.016 287 ± 9 1.68 ± 0.018 0.39
101-it/40mer-st RD 1.185 ± 0.007 0.96 ± 0.007 362 ± 18 1.84 ± 0.007 0.27
91-it/40mer-st RD 1.215 ± 0.007 0.90 ± 0.004 398 ± 2 1.85 ± 0.001 0.08
91-it/40mer-st RD/RU 1.210 ± 0.001 0.89 ± 0.006 399 ± 1 1.85 ± 0.001 0.16
91-it/40mer-st RD/LD 1.200 ± 0.001 0.90 ± 0.004 387 ± 1 1.86 ± 0.011 0.17
91-it/40mer-st RD/LU 1.210 ± 0.001 0.90 ± 0.008 398 ± 2 1.84 ± 0.010 0.17

aSum of differences refers to the sum of the numerical value differences between the peak positions of the simulated structures and the experimental X-ray diffraction. Thus, a smaller value indicates a better agreement with experiment.

bExperimental cohesive energy density of PMMA with unspecified tacticity.46