Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 22;47(2):511–522. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25792

Table 2.

Internal Consistency of Assessment of Flow Volumes Through the Mitral (MV) and Aortic Valve (AV) By Retrospective Valve Tracking and Particle Tracing Analysis

MV flow (mL) AV flow (mL) Difference (AV‐MV) (mL)a Pearson correlation coefficient Intraclass correlation coefficient
Mean ± SD (min‐max) Mean ± SD (min‐max) Mean ± SD (min‐max) ICC (95% C.I.) Coefficient of variation (%)
Retrospective valve tracking scan 1 95.4 ± 17.0 (71.4‐121.2) 92.7 ± 15.5 (68.4‐112.9) −2.7 ± 5.5 (−11.2−7.1) 0.95b 0.97 (0.87‐0.99)b 6
Retrospective valve tracking scan 2 97.6 ± 24.0 (62.3‐135.0) 95.3 ± 20.9 (66.0‐126.4) ‐2.3 ± 5.7 (‐11.7‐6.8) 0.98b 0.98 (0.93‐1.00)b 6
Particle tracing scan 1 91.7 ± 23.6 (57.5‐133.1) 91.6 ± 14.0 (71.5‐112.1) ‐0.04 ± 11.3 (‐22.7‐14.0) 0.95b 0.92 (0.65‐0.98)c 12
Particle tracing scan 2 94.1 ± 20.0 (63.3‐121.8) 88.1 ± 13.6 (68.2‐105.2) ‐5.9 ± 6.8 (‐16.6‐5.0)c 0.99b 0.93 (0.56‐0.99)b 8
a

Differences were calculated with the paired samples t‐test.

b

P < 0.001.

c

P < 0.05.

AV = aortic valve, MV = mitral valve.