Skip to main content
. 2017 May 22;79(2):1192–1199. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26721

Table 1.

Comparison of Shimming Approaches

No Blocks With Blocks RF Shimming P 1 P 2
Transmit efficiency ( μT/W) 0.09 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.02 0.11 ± 0.01 <10−4 0.0009
Receive sensitivity (A.U.) 983 ± 120 967 ± 88 1017 ± 88 0.6773 0.1492
T1 image quality 3.76 ± 0.39 4.23 ± 0.63 4.53 ± 0.29 0.0025 0.1188
T2 image quality 3.89 ± 0.39 4.25 ± 0.53 4.63 ± 0.21 0.0053 0.0258
Average power (W) 252 ± 53.9 201 ± 27.4 344 ± 46.3 0.0124 <10−4

Mean values ± standard deviations of the transmit efficiency and receive sensitivity averaged in the region of interest, of the average powers used, and of the scorings on image quality according to the 1 (very bad) to 5 (excellent) grading system. P 1 values denote the likeliness of the hypothesis H0: μno blocks=μwith blocks and P 2 values denote the likeliness of H0: μwith blocks=μRF shimming, with values below 0.05 indicating statistically significant changes.

A.U., arbitrary units.