Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 9;9:111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00111

Table 2.

Group mean descriptive statistics, standard deviations (SD), and MANCOVA analysis for flow dimension in the three ACE groupings.

0 ACE 1–3 ACE ≥4 ACE
Global flow 3.87 (0.60) 3.85 (0.59) 3.80 (0.55)
CSB 3.93 (0.71) 3.92 (0.68) 3.92 (0.67)
MAA 3.62 (0.75) 3.65 (0.77) 3.65 (0.68)
CG 4.23 (1.53) 4.12 (0.66) 4.17 (0.69)
UF 4.03 (0.67) 3.95 (0.70) 3.93 (0.67)
CTAH 3.95 (0.70) 3.87 (0.76) 3.79 (0.88)
SC 3.96 (0.68) 3.92 (0.79) 3.73 (0.76)
LSC 3.33 (0.97) 3.12 (1.01) 3.05 (1.13)
TT 3.77 (0.91) 3.63 (0.89) 3.57 (0.79)
AE 4.35 (0.63) 4.43 (0.70) 4.43 (0.61)

CSB, challenge–skill balance; MAA, merging action and awareness; CG, clear goals; UF, unambiguous feedback; CTAH, challenge for the task at hand; SC, self-control; LSC, loss of self-consciousness; TT, transformation of time; AE, autotelic experiences. MANCOVA (age and gender covariates) comparison of mean scores showing significant group differences: Wilks’s Λ = 0.908, F(18,430) = 1.173, p = 0.280, η2 = 0.047; gender, p < 0.001; age, p = 0.031.