Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 29;2(3):200–209. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017010694

Table 4.

Adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for inpatient VTE outcome comparing DOAC users to matched control users for the treatment of nonvalvular AF in active cancer patients, MarketScan, 2010-2014

No. of events Person-years No. of events Person-years HR (95% CI) P
DOAC Warfarin
Rivaroxaban vs warfarin 66 2085 160 4156 0.73 (0.53, 1.01) .06
Dabigatran vs warfarin 28 3217 281 8734 0.38 (0.25, 0.57) <.0001
Apixaban vs warfarin 2 541 67 1407 0.14 (0.03, 0.59) .008
DOAC Rivaroxaban
Dabigatran vs rivaroxaban 6 961 15 997 0.37 (0.11, 1.21) .10
Apixaban vs rivaroxaban 2 558 43 1004 0.08 (0.02, 0.35) .0008

Adjusted for age, sex, CHA2DS2-VASc score, prior history of the outcome, and HDPS. Bold values represent statistical significance.