Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Dec 18;27(2):208–218. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0657

Table 1. MicroRNA levels in each of the four blood collection tubes from the comparison study.

Comparison of Ct values and SD values between the different sample types. Ct values for sample sets were defined as being suboptimal if mean microRNA expression values were ≥2 Cts greater than the set with the lowest Ct value. SD values for sample sets were defined as suboptimal if they were ≥2. For both Ct and SD assessment, samples that were not suboptimal were deemed to be satisfactory. Key to blood collection tubes: GSS = gel separator serum; EP = EDTA plasma; SDP = Streck DNA plasma; SRP = Streck RNA plasma.

MicroRNA Role GSS EP SDP SRP
Mean Ct value SD Conclusion Mean Ct value SD Conclusion Mean Ct value SD Conclusion Mean Ct value SD Conclusion
cel-miR-39-3p Exogenous normalization 21.43 0.49 Satisfactory 21.13 0.85 Satisfactory 20.91 1.19 Satisfactory 25.23 4.29 Suboptimal
hsa-miR-30b-5p Endogenous normalization 27.16 0.90 Satisfactory 29.57 1.18 Suboptimal 29.44 1.04 Suboptimal 34.41 4.45 Suboptimal
hsa-miR-30c-5p Endogenous normalization 27.77 0.68 Satisfactory 29.93 1.16 Suboptimal 29.73 1.11 Suboptimal 33.78 4.16 Suboptimal
hsa-miR-191-5p Endogenous normalization 25.91 0.72 Satisfactory 28.76 1.00 Suboptimal 30.02 1.49 Suboptimal 32.74 3.10 Suboptimal
hsa-miR-23a-3p Endogenous normalization (hemolysis) 28.84 0.89 Satisfactory 30.26 1.10 Satisfactory 32.47 0.86 Suboptimal 39.20 0.84 Suboptimal
hsa-miR-451a Hemolysis assessment 21.73 0.96 Satisfactory 21.55 0.72 Satisfactory 23.50 1.27 Satisfactory 32.90 4.30 Suboptimal