Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 14;13(2):e0192552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192552

Table 1. Aerobic capacity parameters derived from the application of the 3MT (EP) and conventional CP tests (critical power hyperbolic model–CP Hyp; critical power work model versus time–CP Ԏ vs t; critical power model versus 1/time–CP P vs 1/t), R2 of mathematical equations, coefficient of variation (CV), confidence interval (IC95%), the error % associated with the prediction of EP (Error %) and effect size (ES) (n = 8).

AEROBIC CAPACITY–POWER OUTPUT (W)
EP CP Hyp CP Ԏ vs t CP P vs 1/t
Mean 181.7 178.2 191.4 188.3
SD 52 61 55 55
IC 95% 43.4 50.9 46 46
R2 0.78 0.98 0.95 0.95
CV% 30.4 35.8 31.3 32.5
Error % - 24.1 24.2 21.3
EFFECT SIZE
EP CP Hyp CP Ԏ vs t CP P vs 1/t
EP - 0.06 0.18 0.12
CP Hyp 0.06 - 0.22 0.17
CP Ԏ vs t 0.88 0.22 - 0.23
CP P vs 1/t 0.12 0.17 0.23 -

*The significance criterion adopted was p ≤ 0.05.