Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 14;13(2):e0192552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192552

Table 2. Anaerobic capacity parameters derived from the application of the 3MT (WEP) and conventional CP tests (W’ Hyp; anaerobic work capacity work model versus time–W’ Ԏ vs t and anaerobic work capacity model versus 1/time–W’ P vs 1/t), R2 of mathematical equations, coefficient of variation (CV), confidence interval (IC95%), the error % associated with the prediction of WEP (%Er-WEP) and effect size (ES) (n = 8).

ANAEROBIC WORK CAPACITY (kJ)
WEP W’ Hyp W’ Ԏ vs t W’ P vs 1/t
Mean 17.9 50.2* 44.8* 45.5*
SD 4.8 15.3 8.7 8.4
IC 95% 4 12.8 7.2 7
R2 0.78 0.98 0.95 0.95
CV% 27.8 33.3 19.9 18.8
Error % 245.1 204.5 182.5
EFFECT SIZE
WEP W’ Hyp W’ Ԏ vs t W’ P vs 1/t
WEP - 3.07 3.92 4.18
W’ Hyp 3.07 - 0.45 0.43
W’ Ԏ vs t 3.92 0.45 - 0.08
W’ P vs 1/t 4.18 0.43 0.08 -

* Significant difference in relation to WEP’