Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 1;13(2):86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2015.07.001

Table 2.

Comparisons of group means between ankle dorsiflexion strength measured pre and post 8 weeks of intervention.

Group Leg Pre Post Variation (%)
MAcu R 239.2 ± 53.2 269.5 ± 37.7* 12.7
L 228.0 ± 55.9 282.2 ± 36.3* 23.8
Combined 233.6 ± 53.2 275.8 ± 36.4* 18.0
MSham R 244.9 ± 34.2 290.0 ± 35.6** 18.4
L 223.2 ± 50.4 295.9 ± 30.2* 32.6
Combined 234.0 ± 43.1 293.0 ± 32.0* 25.2
EAcu R 229.7 ± 47.8 260.2 ± 36.7* 13.3
L 211.7 ± 38.5 255.6 ± 24.8* 20.7
Combined 220.7 ± 43.3 257.9 ± 30.6* 16.9
ESham R 254.1 ± 20.7 288.5 ± 23.8* 13.5
L 253.3 ± 27.7 296.0 ± 20.3* 16.9
Combined 253.7 ± 23.6 292.2 ± 21.7* 15.2
Control R 255.8 ± 15.2 255.3 ± 11.7 −0.2
L 260.3 ± 24.4 253.9 ± 28.6 −2.5
Combined 258.0 ± 19.9 254.6 ± 21.3 −1.3

Data are presented as mean ± SD in Newton.

*p < 0.01, post compared with pre.

EAcu = electroacupuncture on acupoints; ESham = electroacupuncture on sham points; L = left; MAcu = manual acupuncture on acupoints; MSham = manual acupuncture on sham points; R = right; SD = standard deviation.