Table 1.
Maximum Phenotypic Variance Explained by Optimized Polygenic Scores and the Maximum Cumulative Out-of-Sample Prediction for SOJO and GCTA-COJO in UKB
| Cumulative Prediction(%) | Explained by Polygenic Scores (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trait | Top Variant | Standard COJO | Optimized COJO | SOJO | Top Variant | Standard COJO | Optimized COJO | SOJO |
| Height | 14.35 | 17.38 | 23.42 | 24.52 | 13.76 | 16.71 | 21.42 | 22.70 |
| BMI | 1.88 | 1.99 | 2.42 | 2.52 | 1.84 | 1.94 | 2.35 | 2.46 |
| WHRadjBMI | 1.62 | 1.78 | 2.18 | 2.32 | 1.58 | 1.76 | 2.07 | 2.28 |
The for cumulative out-of-sample prediction was computed from a summation of all regional prediction . explained by polygenic scores were the amount of phenotypic variance that could be explained by all regional polygenic scores.
Top variant: only the top variant was selected. Standard COJO: variants selected by COJO with as the threshold. Optimized COJO: variants selected by COJO with threshold maximizing regional prediction . Coefficients of variants in each polygenic score were estimated by joint multiple regression in COJO. SOJO: variants selected by LASSO with tuning parameter maximizing regional prediction . Coefficients of variants in each polygenic score were determined by the LASSO result at the tuning parameter.