Skip to main content
. 2017 May 18;49(1):109–122. doi: 10.1007/s10578-017-0733-0

Table 3.

Frequency of use of father engagement strategies [n (%)]

Always Often Sometimes Rarely Never
Practitioner strategies
 Explaining to mothers the importance of engaging fathers 92 (44.9%) 82 (40.0%) 21 (10.2%) 10 (4.9%) 0 (0.0%)
 Directing equal time and attention to fathers and mothers 83 (40.5%) 83 (40.5%) 27 (13.2%) 8 (3.9%) 4 (2.0%)
 Explaining to fathers the importance of being involved 75 (36.6%) 83 (40.5%) 38 (18.5%) 9 (4.4%) 0 (0.0%)
 Eliciting treatment goals from fathers as well as mothers 69 (33.7%) 77 (37.6%) 38 (18.5%) 17 (8.3%) 4 (2.0%)
 Personally inviting fathers to attend (in person or by phone) 50 (24.4%) 75 (36.6%) 56 (27.3%) 21 (10.2%) 3 (1.5%)
 Problem-solving barriers that prevent fathers from attending 38 (18.5%) 70 (34.1%) 73 (35.6%) 19 (9.3%) 5 (2.4%)
 Where fathers cannot attend, offering separate sessions/phone calls 46 (22.4%) 55 (26.8%) 64 (31.2%) 31 (15.1%) 9 (4.4%)
Service/program strategies
 Obtaining information from fathers as well as mothers 62 (30.5%) 75 (36.9%) 50 (24.6%) 8 (3.9%) 8 (3.9%)
 Emphasizing the importance of father attendance at intake 58 (28.6%) 73 (36.0%) 55 (27.1%) 11 (5.4%) 6 (3.0%)
 Advertising that the program is for fathers as well as mothers 63 (31.0%) 52 (25.6%) 41 (20.2%) 20 (9.9%) 27 (13.3%)
 Offering sessions outside work hours to enable fathers to attend 37 (18.2%) 46 (22.7%) 42 (20.7%) 30 (14.8%) 48 (23.6%)

N = 205. Rank order based on combined ratings of ‘Always’ and ‘Often’