Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 14;9:680. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02727-2

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Galvanostatic cycle. a Discharge (DC)–recharge (RC) profiles for the first cycle with mesoporous carbon (CMK-3, red), ketjen black nanoparticles (KB, dark yellow), carbon nanotube (CNT, black), and large porous carbon (LPC, pore diameter ≈80 nm, orange). All electrodes have same carbon mass of ~1.0 mg and galvanostatic tests were performed at a same current rate of 50 mA g–1carbon in 0.5 M LiTFSI in tetraglyme to the fixed capacity of 1.5 mAh. These controlled conditions allow us to assess the round-trip efficiencies. The dashed line indicates a reversible potential of Li–O2 electrochemistry (2.96 V). Along with various carbon electrodes, DC–RC curves with heterogeneous catalysts such as Ru and Co3O4 nanoparticles with CNT (Ru/CNT, blue and Co3O4/CNT, green) and homogeneous catalyst of 10 mM TEMPO ((2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl) (dark cyan) with CNT were performed. b Comparison of round-trip efficiency calculated from the ratio of the integrated areas under the DC and RC curves