Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 22;23(68):17217–17221. doi: 10.1002/chem.201704964

Table 1.

Comparison of the activation energy barriers (E a) and rotational rates at 230 K (k 230K) for all the TCC cages investigated.

Tubular covalent cages E a [kJ mol−1][a] k 230 [K Hz−1]
[D12]TCC2‐R 18 (18–20) 1.2×106
iodine‐loaded [D12]TCC2‐R 21 (15–21) 1×105
[D12]TCC3‐R 12 (10–13) 8×106
iodine‐loaded [D12]TCC3‐R 21 (14–21) 5×104

[a] Range of E a values estimated from errors in the values of k are given in brackets.