Table 2.
(1) # rxns removed | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 20 | 50 | ||||||
(2) Rxns suggested are identical to rxns removed | 58 | na | 29 | na | 4 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na |
59 | 65 | 26 | 32 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(3) No rxns suggested | 25 | na | 12 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na |
25 | 25 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(4) Rxns suggested are a strict subset of rxns removed | 0 | na | 35 | na | 37 | na | 21 | na | 8 | na | 0 | na |
0 | 0 | 32 | 37 | 38 | 53 | 20 | 49 | 7 | 20 | 0 | 1 | |
(5) # rxns suggested is equal to # rxns re-moved | 10 | na | 9 | na | 16 | na | 8 | na | 3 | na | 0 | na |
9 | 9 | 13 | 11 | 17 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(6) # rxns suggested is less than # rxns re-moved | 0 | na | 8 | na | 29 | na | 58 | na | 83 | na | 97 | na |
0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 29 | 28 | 62 | 47 | 90 | 80 | 100 | 99 | |
(7) # rxns suggested is greater than # rxns removed | 7 | na | 7 | na | 14 | na | 13 | na | 6 | na | 2 | na |
7 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(8) # cases where no solution was found | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na | 1 | na |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Precision (%) | 81 | na | 80 | na | 75 | na | 78 | na | 80 | na | 77 | na |
83 | 87 | 76 | 84 | 77 | 86 | 78 | 90 | 78 | 87 | 77 | 88 | |
Average precision (%) | 78 | na | ||||||||||
78 | 87 | |||||||||||
Recall (%) | 64 | na | 55 | na | 58 | na | 58 | na | 60 | na | 59 | na |
65 | 66 | 54 | 55 | 60 | 61 | 59 | 62 | 58 | 60 | 59 | 60 | |
Average recall (%) | 59 | na | ||||||||||
59 | 61 | |||||||||||
# Solutions that do not show growth | 0 | na | ||||||||||
0 | 4 (0.6%) |
The meaning of rows and columns are the same as in Table 1