Table 3.
(1) # rxns removed | 1 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 20 | 50 | ||||||
(2) Rxns suggested are identical to rxns removed | 63 | na | 28 | na | 6 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na |
59 | 54 | 24 | 27 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(3) No rxns suggested | 25 | na | 12 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na |
25 | 25 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(4) Rxns suggested are a strict subset of rxns removed | 0 | na | 34 | na | 38 | na | 23 | na | 7 | na | 0 | na |
0 | 0 | 34 | 33 | 35 | 49 | 19 | 37 | 8 | 20 | 0 | 0 | |
(5) # rxns suggested is equal to # rxns re-moved | 7 | na | 11 | na | 15 | na | 6 | na | 5 | na | 2 | na |
9 | 9 | 14 | 13 | 19 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
(6) # rxns suggested is less than # rxns re-moved | 0 | na | 7 | na | 25 | na | 59 | na | 82 | na | 97 | na |
0 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 29 | 32 | 64 | 59 | 88 | 80 | 99 | 100 | |
(7) # rxns suggested is greater than # rxns removed | 5 | na | 8 | na | 16 | na | 12 | na | 6 | na | 1 | na |
7 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
(8) # cases where no solution was found | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na | 0 | na |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Precision (%) | 87 | na | 80 | na | 76 | na | 78 | na | 77 | na | 74 | na |
83 | 75 | 77 | 76 | 76 | 82 | 78 | 87 | 78 | 87 | 75 | 88 | |
Average precision (%) | 79 | na | ||||||||||
78 | 83 | |||||||||||
Recall (%) | 67 | na | 56 | na | 61 | na | 59 | na | 59 | na | 59 | na |
53 | 59 | 53 | 51 | 60 | 60 | 59 | 60 | 58 | 60 | 58 | 60 | |
Average recall (%) | 60 | na | ||||||||||
57 | 58 | |||||||||||
# Solutions that do not show growth | 0 | na | ||||||||||
0 | 1 |
The meaning of rows and columns are the same as in Table 1