Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2017 Oct 2;32(1):77–88. doi: 10.1037/neu0000356

Table 3.

Incremental effects of monolingual versus bilingual status on cognitive trajectory components in the overall sample (N=1499/). Results are from models in which monolingual –bilingual status was entered along with age, gender, and education as covariates (covariate effects not shown). Reference values refer to females 70 years of age tested in English with 8 years of education who are monolingual English speakers. 3MS and VM have a mean of 100 and SD of 15.

Cognitive Trajectory Component Independent Variable Estimate SE p
3MS Baseline Average - Reference 105.23 0.61 0.001
3MS Baseline Monolingual Spanish Speaker * −4.08 0.82 0.001
3MS Baseline Bilingual * −0.67 0.63 0.289
3MS Slope Average - Reference 0.04 0.12 0.755
3MS Slope Monolingual Spanish Speaker * 0.00 0.15 0.981
3MS Slope Bilingual * −0.15 0.12 0.213
VM Baseline Average - Reference 104.46 0.65 0.001
VM Baseline Monolingual Spanish Speaker * −1.17 0.90 0.192
VM Baseline Bilingual * −0.39 0.73 0.592
VM Slope Average - Reference −0.63 0.13 0.001
VM Slope Monolingual Spanish Speaker * 0.25 0.17 0.135
VM Slope Bilingual * 0.17 0.13 0.213
*

Difference from reference mean.