Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 23;313(6):C621–C631. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00110.2017

Table 2.

Isometric tension

Species/Solution n A0, mN/mm2 P0, mN/mm2 F0, mN/mm2 Hill Coefficient pCa50
Dros/Swank 11 4.2 ± 0.3LS LR 2.8 ± 0.4LR 1.4 ± 0.2LS LR 2.36 ± 0.58DR LS LR 6.15 ± 0.07LS
Leth/Swank 10 35.1 ± 3.8DS DR LR 18.1 ± 2.3DS DR 17.0 ± 1.7DS DR LR 0.99 ± 0.06DS 5.60 ± 0.06DS DR LR
Dros/Reedy 9 4.4 ± 0.4LS LR 2.5 ± 0.5LS LR 1.9 ± 0.2LS LR 1.17 ± 0.12DS 6.34 ± 0.10LS
Leth/Reedy 10 60.8 ± 2.9DS DR LS 20.8 ± 3.1DS DR 40.1 ± 3.3DS DR LS 0.88 ± 0.05DS 6.06 ± 0.09LS

All values are means ± SE. A0, total active isometric tension (pCa 5.0); P0, passive isometric tension (pCa 8.0); F0, corrected active isometric tension (F0 = A0 − P0). Graphs of the relationship between isometric tension and calcium concentration from individual fibers were fit with the Hill equation to obtain Hill coefficient and pCa50 values for each fiber, which were then averaged. The n values for both sets of Drosophila Hill coefficients and pCa50 values are 3 fibers less than for the isometric tension values. Superscript letters indicate statistical difference between the four sets of fibers based on one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak pairwise multiple comparisons, P < 0.05. DS = Drosophila fibers bathed in Swank solutions; DR = Drosophila fibers bathed in Reedy solutions; LS = Lethocerus fibers bathed in Swank solutions; LR = Lethocerus fibers bathed in Reedy solutions.