Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 17;16(3):784–796. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12828

Table 2.

Comparison in sterol‐related intermediate, sterol, α‐tocopherol and carotenoid composition in tomato fruits

Elevation (%) in tomato fruits
Sterol‐related intermediates and sterols 430 vs pSa13 445 vs pSa13 622 vs pSa13 625 vs pSa13 OE‐S359A vs OE‐wtBjHMGS1
Squalene −2.9 81.2 133.6 293.0 125.1
Cycloartenol 181.1 101.9 125.9 280.2 6.5
24‐Methylene‐cycloartanol −10.5 92.1 24.3 6.9 −17.9
Cycloeucalenol 60.9 43.0 80.8 118.1 31.2
24‐Methylene‐lophenol 77.9 115.7 65.9 133.9 1.6
Campesterol 24.0 19.2 94.1 93.3 58.7
β‐Sitosterol 38.3 42.9 87.1 112.5 42.1
Stigmasterol 61.5 33.9 47.7 74.4 9.0
Δ7,22‐Ergostadienol 149.1 101.9 97.9 181.8 6.4
Total sterol 54.7 62.6 74.1 113.2 22.1
α‐Tocopherol 542.6 500.1 405.0 583.1 −4.4
Lycopene 256.6 211.0 123.7 98.4 52.5
β‐Carotene 343.3 150.4 135.9 202.6 31.4
Total carotenoids 277.1 184.5 122.8 128.1 45.6

Two independent lines for each OE genotype were analysed. For tomato OE‐wtBjHMGS1, lines 430 and 445 were tested. For tomato OE‐S359A, lines 622 and 625 were tested. The data presented for OE‐S359A in comparison with OE‐wtBjHMGS1 were calculated from an average of two lines (average of 622 and 625 for OE‐S359A in comparison with average of 430 and 445 for OE‐wtBjHMGS1). Bold font indicates significant (P < 0.05) % increases, in OE‐S359A (over OE‐wtBjHMGS1) and in OE‐wtBjHMGS1 and OE‐S359A (over the vector‐transformed control pSa13).