Table 2.
Group | fNPo | Po | fN |
---|---|---|---|
WT sham | 0.31 ± 0.06 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.87 ± 0.12 |
WT sham + ANG II | 1.63 ± 0.25* | 0.57 ± 0.04* | 3.73 ± 0.39* |
WT sham + ANG II + spironolactone | 0.91 ± 0.09* | 0.52 ± 0.03* | 1.82 ± 0.18* |
CDPRR-KO sham | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.04 | 0.92 ± 0.11 |
CDPRR-KO + ANG II | 1.11 ± 0.15*# | 0.41 ± 0.03*# | 2.47 ± 0.26*# |
CDPRR-KO + ANG II + spironolactone | 0.87 ± 0.13* | 0.41 ± 0.03* | 2.01 ± 0.24 |
Data presented as means ± SE. Summary of total ENaC activity (fNPo), functional ENaC expression (fN), and ENaC open probability (Po) in wild-type (WT) and CDPRR-KO mice after 2 wk of infusions with vehicle (sham; n = 6), ANG II (n = 6), and ANG II plus spironolactone 30 mg/kg body wt in drinking water (n = 6).
P < 0.05 vs. sham WT split-open collecting ducts (n = 40–50);
P < 0.05 vs. WT corresponding treatment.