Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 16;313(6):F1243–F1253. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00152.2017

Table 2.

ENaC functional studies in split-open collecting ducts in WT and CDPRR-KO mice

Group fNPo Po fN
WT sham 0.31 ± 0.06 0.32 ± 0.03 0.87 ± 0.12
WT sham + ANG II 1.63 ± 0.25* 0.57 ± 0.04* 3.73 ± 0.39*
WT sham + ANG II + spironolactone 0.91 ± 0.09* 0.52 ± 0.03* 1.82 ± 0.18*
CDPRR-KO sham 0.28 ± 0.05 0.30 ± 0.04 0.92 ± 0.11
CDPRR-KO + ANG II 1.11 ± 0.15*# 0.41 ± 0.03*# 2.47 ± 0.26*#
CDPRR-KO + ANG II + spironolactone 0.87 ± 0.13* 0.41 ± 0.03* 2.01 ± 0.24

Data presented as means ± SE. Summary of total ENaC activity (fNPo), functional ENaC expression (fN), and ENaC open probability (Po) in wild-type (WT) and CDPRR-KO mice after 2 wk of infusions with vehicle (sham; n = 6), ANG II (n = 6), and ANG II plus spironolactone 30 mg/kg body wt in drinking water (n = 6).

*

P < 0.05 vs. sham WT split-open collecting ducts (n = 40–50);

#

P < 0.05 vs. WT corresponding treatment.