Table 1:
Habitat | Species | Study | Location | Parallelisma | Percent recoveryb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Terrestrial | Green treefrog | Validation; field | Captive; wild | 0.996 | y = 0.891x + 3.389; R2 = 0.997; P < 0.001 |
American toad | Validation; field | Captive; wild | 0.988 | y = 0.985x + 0.207; R2 = 0.990; P < 0.001 | |
Semi-aquatic | Northern leopard frog | Validation; field | Captive; wild | 0.993 | y = 0.887x + 0.113; R2 = 0.999; P < 0.001 |
Cricket frog | Validation | Wild | 0.993 | y = 1.180x + 0.798; R2 = 0.995; P < 0.001 | |
Aquatic | Axolotl | Validation | Captive | 0.997 | y = 0.833x + 6.262; R2 = 0.993; P < 0.001 |
Red-spotted newt | Validation | Captive | 0.963 | y = 0.887x + 0.113; R2 = 0.999; P < 0.001 | |
Mudpuppy | Validation | Captive | 0.992 | y = 0.985x + 0.827; R2 = 0.999; P < 0.001 | |
American Bullfrog | Field | Wild | 0.991 | y = 1.160x + 2.823; R2 = 0.999; P < 0.001 | |
Green frog | Field | Wild | 0.996 | y = 0.891x + 3.389; R2 = 0.997; P < 0.001 | |
Western chorus frog | Field | Wild | 0.985 | y = 0.834x + 0.903; R2 = 0.999; P < 0.001 | |
Spring peeper | Field | Wild | 0.995 | y = 1.176x + 0.422; R2 = 0.999; P < 0.001 | |
Tiger salamander | Field | Wild | 0.993 | y = 1.150x + 0.485; R2 = 0.998; P < 0.001 | |
Rough-skinned newt | Validation | Captive | 0.996 | y = 0.834x + 0.903; R2 = 0.999; P < 0.001 | |
Blue-spotted salamander | Field | Wild | 0.997 | y = 1.020x + 1.500; R2 = 0.999; P < 0.001 | |
Hellbender | Validation | Captive | 0.751 | y = 1.005x + 0.641; R2 = 0.999; P < 0.001 |
aParallelism compares the relationship between cortisol standards and serially diluted swab samples (2× concentrated to 1:16) separately for all species calculated using Pearson’s Product Moment correlation.
bPercent recovery calculated as a best fit line using a linear regression of observed over expected values when known amounts of cortisol standard is added to a sample.