Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 12;35(2):232–241. doi: 10.1111/dme.13552

Table 3.

Intervention adherence and psychosocial outcome measures divided by intervention use

Intervention adherence
All participants (N=78) Median (min.; max.) 25th/75th percentile
Total logins to the system (n=67)* 91 (2; 6413) 19.75/214.25
Visits to facts page 8 (0; 508) 3/26
Number of entries to the self‐care diary 1 (0; 5850) 0/25.25
Visits to the forum 54 (0.0; 703) 7/125
Outcome variables divided by level of intervention use 6 months after childbirth
Participants (N=78) No/low usage Medium usage High usage§ P
n=17 n=42 n=19
W‐BQ12 (score range 0–36) n=14 n=38 n=17 0.28
Mean (sd) 21.5 (5.4) 23.3 (6.4) 24.7 (5.2)
Median (min.; max.) 22.5 (15; 31) 24 (10; 35) 25 (13; 34)
SWE‐DES‐10 (score range 1–5) n=14 n=38 n=17 0.37
Mean (sd) 3.7 (0.7) 3.9 (0.5) 4.0 (0.5)
Median (min.; max.) 3.9 (2; 5) 4 (3; 5) 4 (3; 5)
SOC‐13 (score range 13–91) n=14 n=38 n=17 0.37
Mean (sd) 67.8 (11.5) 67.0 (11.8) 71.3 (8.9)
Median (min.; max.) 65 (48; 84) 68 (47; 89) 72 (51; 85)
SWE‐PAID‐20 (score range 0–100) n=14 n=38 n=17 0.15
Mean (sd) 32.1 (20.5) 29.2 (20.2) 22.5 (16.0)
Median (min.; max.) 30 (4; 86) 26 (0; 70) 17.5 (5; 58)
SWE‐HFS (score range 0–80) n=14 n=38 n=17 0.14
Mean (sd) 27.8 (10.2) 26.7 (13.6) 21.9 (10.2)
Median (min.; max.) 27.5 (11; 43) 28.5 (2; 66) 23 (4; 40)

SOC‐13, 13‐item Sense of Coherence questionnaire; SWE‐DES‐10, Swedish Diabetes Empowerment Scale, short version; SWE‐HFS, Swedish Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey; SWE‐PAID‐20, Swedish Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale; W‐BQ12, 12‐item well‐being questionnaire.

For comparison between groups the Jonckheere–Terpstra test was used.

*Eleven participants did not meet the criteria of two individual logins to the system.

Groups for the dose–response analysis were calculated using percentiles as cut‐offs in the following way: Below the 25th percentile; <9. 25th to 75th percentile; 9–191.75. §Above the 75th percentile; ≥ 192.