Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 28;180(2):224–235. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15025

Table 1.

Univariate and multivariate analyses by Cox Regression on PFS by investigator assessment.a

Baseline variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Treatment (lenalidomide versus IC) 0·65 (0·48–0·87) 0·005 0·42 (0·28–0·62) <0·001
MIPI‐based characteristics
MIPI score at diagnosis (high versus low/intermediate)b 1·57 (1·12–2·20) 0·009
MIPI score at baseline (high versus low/intermediate)b 2·11 (1·57–2·83) <0·001 1·51 (1·00–2·27) 0·052
Age, years (≥65 vs. <65) 1·02 (0·75–1·38) 0·919
ECOG PS (2 vs. 0–1) 1·46 (0·99–2·16) 0·053
LDH (high versus low/normal)c 2·00 (1·49–2·67) <0·001 2·02 (1·35–3·01) <0·001
WBC (≥10 × 109/l vs. <10 × 109/l) 1·55 (1·08–2·21) 0·017
Other patient characteristics
Sex (female versus male) 0·86 (0·62–1·18) 0·348
MCL stage at diagnosis (III/IV versus I/II) 0·81 (0·46–1·42) 0·461
Tumour burden (low versus high)d 0·81 (0·60–1·08) 0·155
Bulky disease (yes versus no)e 1·40 (0·98–2·01) 0·063 1·57 (1·01–2·43) 0·045
Bone marrow assessment (negative versus indeterminate/positive)f 0·72 (0·44–1·20) 0·206
Renal function (normal versus moderate/severe insufficiency)g 0·60 (0·43–0·84) 0·003
Prior treatment history
Time from MCL diagnosis to first dose (≥3 versus <3 years) 0·85 (0·64–1·14) 0·280
Number of prior systemic antilymphoma therapies (≥3 versus <3) 1·51 (1·11–2·06) 0·009 1·75 (1·19–2·58) 0·005
Disease status to last prior therapy (relapsedh versus refractory) 0·77 (0·58–1·03) 0·075
Time from last prior therapy to first dose (≥6 vs. <6 months) 0·74 (0·55–0·98) 0·034 0·68 (0·47–0·97) 0·032
Time since last rituximab to first dose (≥230 vs. <230 days) 0·79 (0·59–1·07) 0·127
Prior HDT (yes versus no)i 0·98 (0·68–1·42) 0·930
Prior SCT (yes versus no) 0·96 (0·66–1·39) 0·837

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; CR, complete response; CrCl, creatinine clearance; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HDT, high‐dose therapy; HR, hazard ratio; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; MIPI, MCL International Prognostic Index; PFS, progression‐free survival; SCT, stem cell transplantation; WBC, white blood cell count.

a

Variables with P value <0·20 in the univariate analysis were selected for multivariate analysis. Final variables were selected using a stepwise selection method with entry level = 0·20 and stay level = 0·15. Multivariate survival analysis using Cox's regression model was estimated using 162 patients.

b

MIPI score = 0·03535 * age + 0·6978 * (if ECOG PS >1) + 1·367 * log10 (LDH/upper limit of normal) + 0·9393 * log10 (WBC per 10−6/l).

c

High LDH was >3·4 μkat/l for patients aged ≤60 years and >3·5 μkat/l for those aged >60 years; low LDH was <1·8 μkat/l; normal was defined per local laboratory criteria.

d

High tumour burden was defined by at least one lesion ≥5 cm in diameter or three lesions ≥3 cm in diameter by central radiology review.

e

Bulky disease was defined by at least one lesion ≥7 cm in the longest diameter by central radiology review.

f

For estimation of bone marrow involvement by local pathologist, negative was defined as having no aggregates or only a few well‐circumscribed lymphoid aggregates, indeterminate bone marrow was defined as having an increased number/size of lymphoid aggregates without overt malignancy, and positive was defined as an unequivocal malignancy.

g

Normal renal function was defined as CrCl of ≥60 ml/min; moderate insufficiency had CrCl ≥30 to <60 ml/min but not requiring dialysis; severe insufficiency had CrCl <30 ml/min. 2 patients had severe insufficiency in this study.

h

Relapse included patients with best response to last treatment of CR, unconfirmed CR, or partial response.

i

HDT was defined as SCT, hyper‐CVAD (hyper fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone plus methotrexate and cytarabine), or R‐hyper‐CVAD (rituximab + Hyper CVAD).