Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 28;180(2):224–235. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15025

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses by Cox Regression on overall survival by investigator assessment.a

Baseline variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Treatment (lenalidomide versus IC) 0·86 (0·62–1·18) 0·35
MIPI‐based characteristics
MIPI score at diagnosis (high versus low/intermediate)b 1·80 (1·27–2·56) 0·001
MIPI score at baseline (high versus low/intermediate)b 2·00 (1·47–2·74) <0·001 1·49 (0·96–2·32) 0·08
Age, years (≥65 vs. <65) 1·14 (0·82–1·60) 0·44
ECOG PS (2 vs. 0–1) 1·62 (1·07–2·43) 0·02
LDH (high versus low/normal)c 1·96 (1·44–2·68) <0·001 1·50 (0·97–2·30) 0·07
WBC (≥10 × 109/l vs. <10 × 109/l) 1·42 (0·96–2·08) 0·08
Other patient characteristics
Sex (female versus male) 0·77 (0·54–1·11) 0·16 0·54 (0·33–0·89) 0·02
MCL stage at diagnosis (III/IV versus I/II) 0·96 (0·50–1·82) 0·89
Tumour burden (low versus high)d 0·68 (0·50–0·94) 0·02
Bulky disease (yes versus no)e 1·55 (1·06–2·25) 0·02 1·54 (0·97–2·44) 0·07
Bone marrow assessment (negative versus indeterminate/positive)f 0·71 (0·42–1·22) 0·22
Renal function (normal versus moderate/severe insufficiency)g 0·71 (0·50–1·01) 0·06
Prior treatment history
Time from MCL diagnosis to first dose (≥3 vs. <3 years) 0·82 (0·60–1·12) 0·22
Number of prior systemic antilymphoma therapies (≥3 vs. <3) 1·59 (1·14–2·22) 0·006 1·49 (0·98–2·25) 0·06
Disease status to last prior therapy (relapsedh versus refractory) 0·70 (0·51–0·96) 0·03
Time from last prior therapy to first dose (≥6 vs. <6 months) 0·60 (0·44–0·82) 0·001 0·69 (0·47–1·04) 0·08
Time since last rituximab to first dose (≥230 vs. <230 days) 0·74 (0·53–1·02) 0·07
Prior HDT (yes versus no)i 1·13 (0·77–1·68) 0·53
Prior SCT (yes versus no) 1·09 (0·74–1·62) 0·66

95% CI, 95% confidence interval; CR, complete response; CrCl, creatinine clearance; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HDT, high‐dose therapy; HR, hazard ratio; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; MIPI, MCL International Prognostic Index; PFS, progression‐free survival; SCT, stem cell transplantation; WBC, white blood cell count.

a

Variables with P value <0·20 in the univariate analysis were used to select for the multivariate. Final variables were selected using a stepwise selection method with entry level = 0·20 and stay level = 0·15. Multivariate survival analysis using Cox's regression model was estimated using 162 patients.

b

MIPI score = 0·03535 * age + 0·6978 * (if ECOG PS >1) + 1·367 * log10 (LDH/ULN) + 0·9393 * log10 (WBC per 10−6/l).

c

High LDH was >3·4 μkat/l for patients aged ≤60 years and >3·5 μkat/l for those aged >60 years; low LDH was <1·8 μkat/l; normal was defined per local laboratory criteria.

d

High tumour burden was defined by at least one lesion ≥5 cm in diameter or three lesions ≥3 cm in diameter by central radiology review.

e

Bulky disease was defined by at least one lesion ≥7 cm in the longest diameter by central radiology review.

f

For estimation of bone marrow involvement by local pathologist, negative was defined as having no aggregates or only a few well‐circumscribed lymphoid aggregates, indeterminate bone marrow was defined as having an increased number/size of lymphoid aggregates without overt malignancy, and positive was defined as an unequivocal malignancy.

g

Normal renal function was defined as CrCl of ≥60 ml/min; moderate insufficiency had CrCl ≥30 to <60 ml/min but not requiring dialysis; severe insufficiency had CrCl <30 ml/min. 2 patients had severe insufficiency in this study.

h

Relapse included patients with best response to last treatment of CR, unconfirmed CR, or partial response.

i

HDT was defined as SCT, hyper‐CVAD (hyper fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone plus methotrexate and cytarabine), or R‐hyper‐CVAD (rituximab + Hyper CVAD).