Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 18;2(12):1375–1379. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3808

Table 2. Effectiveness and Safety Outcomes and Comparison.

Outcome SMART-AF Analysis Reproduction Analysis
No. % (95% CI) No. % (95% CI)
Effectiveness cohort outcomes
12-mo freedom from arrhythmiaa 122 74.0 (66.0-82.0) 124 76.4 (68.7-84.1)
Success rateb 77 65.8 (56.7-74.3) 90 75.6 (67.2-82.5)
Reason for failure
AF recurrence post-blanking 31 26.5 (NR) 23 19.3 (12.8-27.4)
Repeat ablation 6 5.1 (NR) 6 5.0 (1.9-10.5)
Taking new AAD at 12 mo 4 3.4 (NR) 0 0.0 (0.0-2.9)
Safety cohort outcomesc
Cardiac tamponade 4 2.5 (NR) 4 2.5 (0.7-6.2)
Heart block 1 0.6 (NR) 1 0.6 (0.0-3.4)
Pericarditis 3 1.9 (NR) 4 2.5 (0.7-6.2)
Vascular access problem 4 2.5 (NR) 5 3.1 (1.0-7.1)
Pericardial effusion NR (NR) 3 1.9 (0.4-5.4)

Abbreviations: AAD, antiarrhythmic drug; AF, atrial fibrillation; NR, not reported; SMART-AF, THERMACOOL SMARTTOUCH Catheter for the Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation..

a

Reported results are for symptomatic atrial arrhythmia as displayed in Figure 2 in the primary study report by Natale et al; No. = initial at risk population for Kaplan-Meier analysis.

b

n = 117 for SMART-AF analysis (5 lost to follow-up) and n = 119 for reproduction analysis (5 lost to follow-up).

c

n = 161 for SMART-AF analysis and n = 162 for reproduction analysis.