Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2493–2501. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7220

Table 3. Participant-Reported Symptom Severity and Participant Self-Evaluation of Therapeutic Effectsa.

Week 6 Week 18 Weeks 30
Electro-
acupuncture

(n = 252)
Sham
Electro-
acupuncture

(n = 252)
P Valueb Electro-
acupuncture

(n = 252)
Sham
Electro-
acupuncture

(n = 252)
P Valueb Electro-
acupuncture

(n = 252)
Sham
Electro-
acupuncture

(n = 252)
P Valueb
Severity of Stress Urinary Incontinencec
None 13 (5.3) 6 (2.4) .03 40 (16.5) 17 (7.1) <.001 51 (21.1) 24 (10.0) <.001
Mild 138 (56.1) 121 (49.2) 166 (68.6) 134 (56.1) 147 (60.7) 140 (58.6)
Medium 88 (35.8) 102 (41.5) 30 (12.4) 75 (31.4) 39 (16.1) 66 (27.6)
Severe 7 (2.8) 17 (6.9) 6 (2.5) 13 (5.4) 5 (2.1) 9 (3.8)
Missing 6 6 10 13 10 13
Participant Self-evaluation of Therapeutic Effects
No help 2 (0.8) 75 (30.5) <.001 8 (3.3) 76 (31.8) <.001 15 (6.2) 82 (34.3) <.001
Little help 34 (13.8) 96 (39.0) 50 (20.6) 97 (40.6) 45 (18.5) 89 (37.2)
Medium help 119 (48.4) 47 (19.1) 104 (42.8) 35 (14.6) 95 (39.1) 40 (16.7)
Great help 91 (37.0) 28 (11.4) 81 (33.3) 31 (13.0) 88 (36.2) 28 (11.7)
Missing 6 6 9 13 9 13
a

There were 252 participants for each group and time period.

b

Calculated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

c

Rated using the 72-hour bladder diary by participants ( mild, leaking several drops; moderate, soaking the underwear; severe, soaking the outerwear). The worst degree of urine incontinence during weeks 1 to 6, 15 to 18 and 27 to 30 was used as the severity of stress urinary incontinence for each corresponding time period.