Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 7;38(6):1472–1481. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2602-17.2017

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Stimulus matching. The sentences used in the fMRI study were very well matched on a range of features, and, as expected, the sentences in categories 1–4 were significantly more imageable than those in categories 5 and 6. Means +/− 1 SEM.