Table 1.
Data statistics
| Reference | Test | Result | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | Raise to 32oC on QC | t(7) = 1.626, p = 0.148 | Paired t test |
| D-TC on QC at 32oC | t(8) = −4.765, p = 0.00142 | Paired t test | |
| Fig. 1D | Holding at −40 mV and −90 mV on QC | t(9) = −0.635, p = 0.541 | Paired t test |
| Fig. 2A | Baseline QC (QC) | F(3,15) = 0.805, p = 0.499 | ANOVA |
| Fig. 2A | D-TC on QC | Paired t test | |
| Control | t(21) = −11.467, p = 1.67E-10 | ||
| αCtxArIB | t(8) = −10.814, p = 4.72E-6 | ||
| Atropine | t(4) = −8.102, p = 0.00126 | ||
| α7KO | t(19) = −7.316, p = 6.15E-7 | ||
| Fig. 2B | α-Ctx MI on QC | F(2,6) = 9.787, p < 0.0001 | ANOVA |
| Fig. 3C | D-TC on QC with CCh puff | t(9) = −15.213, p = 9.98E-8 | ANOVA |
| Fig. 3G | Effect of ACh | ANOVA | |
| EPC | F(1,8) = 72.463, p < 0.0001 | ||
| mEPC | F(1,8) = 184.117, p < 0.0001 | ||
| QC | F(1,8) = 0.267, p = 0.667 | ||
| Fig. 3H | Ctrl vs +ACh + atropine | ANOVA | |
| EPC | F(1,6) = 25.143 p < 0.0001 | ||
| mEPC | F(1,6) = 31.179, p ≤ 0.0001 | ||
| QC | F(1,6) = 0.026, p = 0.873 | ||
| Fig. 3H | Ctrl vs ACh + atropine + D-TC | ANOVA | |
| EPC | F(1,6) = 70.508, p ≤ 0.0001 | ||
| mEPC | F(1,6) = 269.432, p ≤ 0.0001 | ||
| QC | F(1,6) = 25.644, p ≤ 0.0001 | ||
| Fig. 3H | ACh + atropine vs ACh + atropine + D-TC | ANOVA | |
| EPC | F(1,6) = 10.924, p = 0.001 | ||
| mEPC | F(1,6) = 250.029, p ≤ 0.0001 | ||
| QC | F(1,6) = 25.644, p ≤ 0.0001 | ||
| Fig. 4A | Before vs vecuronium | ANOVA | |
| EPC | F(1,10) = 126.367, p < 0.0001 | ||
| mEPC | F(1,10) = 805.135, p < 0.0001 | ||
| QC | F(1,10) = 42.313, p < 0.0001 | ||
| Fig. 4A | Vecuronium vs washout | ANOVA | |
| EPC | F(1,10) = 54.36, p < 0.0001 | ||
| mEPC | F(1,10) = 596.527, p < 0.0001 | ||
| QC | F(1,10) = 27.124, p < 0.0001 | ||
| Fig. 4B | Before vs mecamylamine | ANOVA | |
| EPC | F(1,4) = 7.92, p = 0.006 | ||
| mEPC | F(1,4) = 338.71, p < 0.0001 | ||
| QC | F(1,4) = 54.659, p < 0.0001 | ||
| Fig. 4B | Mecamylamine vs washout | ANOVA | |
| EPC | F(1,4) = 10.835, p = 0.002 | ||
| mEPC | F(1,4) = 602.623, p < 0.0001 | ||
| QC | F(1,4) = 39.211, p < 0.0001 | ||
| Fig. 4D | Before vs succinylcholine | ANOVA | |
| EPC | F(1,8) = 273.314, p < 0.0001 | ||
| mEPC | F(1,8) = 493.958, p < 0.0001 | ||
| QC | F(1,8) = 0.528, p = 0.498 | ||
| Fig. 4D | Succinylcholine vs washout | ANOVA | |
| EPC | F(1,8) = 110.816, p < 0.0001 | ||
| mEPC | F(1,8) = 172.376, p < 0.0001 | ||
| QC | F(1,8) = 0.486, p < 0.487 | ||
| Fig. 5B | mEPC decay tau change by | Paired t test | |
| BTX | t(18) = 6.458, p = 4.48E-6 | ||
| D-TC | t(17) = 12.355, p = 1.35E-9 | ||
| Gallamine (GT) | t(9) = 5.825, p = 2.52E-4 | ||
| Mecamylamine | t(4) = 7.263, p = 0.00191 | ||
| Vecuronium | t(12) = 5.048, p = 2.85E-4 | ||
| Succinylcholine | t(11) = −1.956, p = 0.0790 | ||
| ACh/CCh | t(21) = 3.705, p = 0.0014 | ||
| BTX vs ACh/CCh on decay tau | t(38) = 4.197, p = 1.57E-4 | t test |