Table 1.

Echocardiographic evaluations.

		Con	Inf	Inf+P	Inf+RT	Inf+RT+P
MI area (%)	Baseline	–	44.4 ± 3	39.5 ± 8	40.1 ± 2	44.3 ± 4
	Final	–	45.6 ± 4	15.3 ± 2b	44.7 ± 5c	27.3 ± 2bd
LV mass (g)	Baseline	1.07 ± 0.02	1.15 ± 0.04	1.17 ± 0.04	1.11 ± 0.05	1.12 ± 0.06
	Final	1.00 ± 0.05	1.42 ± 0.05ae	1.26 ± 0.04b	1.55 ± 0.06abce	1.29 ± 0.04abd
LVDD (cm)	Baseline	0.62 ± 0.02	0.83 ± 0.02a	0.87 ± 0.05a	0.84 ± 0.02a	0.85 ± 0.06a
	Final	0.69 ± 0.02	0.97 ± 0.04ae	0.80 ± 0.01b	0.87 ± 0.05a	0.89 ± 0.04a
RWT	Baseline	0.39 ± 0.04	0.35 ± 0.02	0.41 ± 0.04	0.43 ± 0.05	0.44 ± 0.02
	Final	0.45 ± 0.03	0.24 ± 0.04ae	0.46 ± 0.04b	0.48 ± 0.04b	0.49 ± 0.02b
EF (%)	Baseline	40 ± 3	28 ± 2a	25 ± 2a	27 ± 3a	26 ± 4a
	Final	38 ± 1	26 ± 3a	34 ± 2e	29 ± 4	35 ± 3e
EA	Baseline	1.55 ± 0.11	2.77 ± 0.14a	2.70 ± 0.17a	2.75 ± 0.14a	2.73 ± 0.13a
	Final	1.57 ± 0.09	2.97 ± 0.19a	1.66 ± 0.15b	2.12 ± 0.11b	1.54 ± 0.17b

Values expressed as mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest. MI – myocardial infarction;

LV mass, left ventricle mass; RWT, relative wall thickness; EF, ejection fraction; EA, E wave A wave ratio; a, P < 0.05 vs. Con; b, P < 0.05 vs. Inf; c, P < 0.05 vs. Inf+P; d, P < 0.05 vs. Inf+RT; e, P < 0.05 vs. Baseline.