Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 9;5(1):86–95. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0346-0

Table 2.

Ethnic differences in blood sugar control (HbA1c) with ‘energy to spare’ as the mediator, before and after adjusting for selected biopsychosocial covariates

Variables Path a (ethnicity → energy) Path b (energy → HbA1c) Path c (ethnicity → HbA1c) Path a*b or indirect effect (ethnicity → energy → HbA1c) Total effect
Unadjusted −0.32 (−0.49, −0.160)*** −0.92 (−1.29, −0.55)*** −2.15 (−3.64, −0.67)** 0.30 (0.13, 0.58)** −1.83 (−3.32, −0.35)*
Adjusted for age (0 to 90), and gender (male = 1, female = 2), employment earnings (receiving = 1, not = 0) −0.26 (−0.44, −0.09)** −0.44 (−0.80, −0.07)* −4.05 (−5.61, −2.49)*** 0.11 (0.01, 0.32)**** −3.91 (−5.47, −2.36)***
Adjusted for age (0 to 90), and gender (male = 1, female = 2), employment earnings (receiving = 1, not = 0), BMI score −0.19 (−0.37, −0.00)* −0.29 (−0.66, 0.07)*** −4.14 (−5.72, −2.57)*** 0.05 (−0.00, 0.21) −4.05 (−5.61, −2.48)***
Adjusted for age (0 to 90), and gender (male = 1, female = 2), employment earnings (receiving = 1, not = 0), BMI score, high blood pressure (yes = 1, no = 0) −0.19 (−0.38, −0.01)* −0.20 (−0.57, 0.15) −4.05 (−5.61, −2.48)*** 0.04 (−0.02, 0.17) −3.97 (−5.53, −2.41)***
Adjusted for age (0 to 90), and gender (male = 1, female = 2), employment earnings (receiving = 1, not = 0), BMI score, high blood pressure (yes = 1, no = 0), diabetes status (had = 1, never had = 0) −0.21 (−0.39, −0.02)* −0.04 (−0.35, 0.26) −2.74 (−4.06, −1.41)*** 0.00 (−0.05, 0.11) −2.70 (−4.02, −1.38)***
Adjusted for age (0 to 90), and gender (male = 1, female = 2), employment earnings (receiving = 1, not = 0), BMI score, high blood pressure (yes = 1, no = 0), diabetes status (had = 1, never had = 0), cigarette smoking (number smoked), physical activity (IPAQ ‘active’ = 1, ‘not active’ = 0) 0.24 (−0.44, −0.04)* −0.04 (−0.36, 0.28) −2.27 (−3.72, −0.83)** 0.01 (−0.07, 0.12) −2.24 (−3.68, −0.81)**

The table does not include the direct effect of variable X (ethnicity) on variable Y (HbA1c) unadjusted for variance attributable to the mediator (perceived ‘energy to spare’)

*(p < 0.05), **(p < 0.01), ***(p < 0.001), ****p > 0.05 (indirect effect is significant based on CI’s, albeit conservative Sobel test not significant)