Table 3.
Results obtained from one-factor analysis of variance statistical method (ANOVA) (with Bonferroni post hoc test) of positive visually enhanced VOR (VVOR) gain values.
| Differences in positive VVOR gain (GAUCp) (ANOVA) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Healthy | Vestibular bilateral | Vestibular unilateral | CANVAS |
| Healthy | – | 0.16 ± 0.05 (*p = 0.01) | 0.19 ± 0.1 (*p = 0.005) | 0.55 ± 0.06 (*p < 0.001) |
| Bilateral vestibular | −0.16 ± 0.05 (*p = 0.01) | – | 0.03 ± 0.05 (p = 1) | 0.38 ± 0.06 (*p < 0.001) |
| Unilateral vestibular | −0.19 ± 0.05 (*p = 0.005) | −0.03 ± 0.05 (p = 1) | – | 0.35 ± 0.06 (*p < 001) |
| CANVAS | −0.55 ± 0.06 (*p < 0.001) | −0.38 ± 0.06 (*p < 0.001) | −0.35 ± 0.06 (*p < 0.001) | – |
ANOVA revealed statistical significant difference between the positive VVOR gain variable for the groups used in this study (p < 0.001).
* represents significant difference (p < 0.05).
CANVAS, cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, and vestibular areflexia syndrome.