Table 4.
Results obtained from one-factor analysis of variance statistical method (ANOVA) (with Bonferroni post hoc test) for negative visually enhanced VOR (VVOR) gain values.
| Differences in negative VVOR GAIN (GAUCn) (ANOVA) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Healthy | Vestibular bilateral | Vestibular unilateral | CANVAS |
| Healthy | – | 0.17 ± 0.05 (*p = 0.02) | 0.26 ± 0.06 (*p = 0.001) | 0.59 ± 0.07 (*p < 0.001) |
| Bilateral vestibular | −0.17 ± 0.05 (*p = 0.02) | – | 0.08 ± 0.06 (p = 1) | 0.41 ± 0.07 (*p < 0.001) |
| Unilateral vestibular | −0.26 ± 0.06 (*p = 0.001) | −0.08 ± 0.06 (p = 1) | – | 0.33 ± 0.07 (*p < 0.001) |
| CANVAS | −0.59 ± 0.07 (*p < 0.001) | −0.41 ± 0.07 (*p < 0.001) | −0.33 ± 0.07 (*p < 0.001) | – |
ANOVA revealed statistical significant differences between the negative VVOR gain variable for the groups used in this study (p < 0.001).
* represents significant difference (p < 0.05).
CANVAS, cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, and vestibular areflexia syndrome.