Table 2.
Model | Domain | Level | OR (95% CI, P-value) | P-value | Linear trend (95%CI, P-value) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model with individual domain managing countsa | Biological | No risk | Reference | < 0.01 | 1.99 (1.64 to 2.41, < 0.01) |
Some risk | 1.46 (0.99 to 2.15, 0.06) | ||||
High risk | 3.92 (2.68 to 5.72, < 0.01) | ||||
Psychological | No risk | Reference | < 0.01 | 1.59 (1.28 to 1.98, < 0.01) | |
Some risk | 1.62 (1.09 to 2.41, 0.02) | ||||
High risk | 2.50 (1.56 to 4.02, < 0.01) | ||||
Social | No risk | Reference | < 0.01 | 1.33 (1.10 to 1.60, < 0.01) | |
Some risk | 1.69 (1.17 to 2.46, 0.01) | ||||
High risk | 1.82 (1.24 to 2.67, < 0.01) | ||||
Model with managing scoresb | BioPsychoSocial | Doing well | Reference | < 0.01 | 2.33 (1.92 to 2.83, < 0.01) |
Some problems | 2.18 (1.52 to 3.13, < 0.01) | ||||
Many problems | 4.98 (3.26 to 7.59, < 0.01) | ||||
Overwhelming problems | 17.96 (6.86 to 47.05, < 0.01) |
aThe individual B, P, S categories were put into the same model with the following covariates: age, gender, ethnicity, income and education
bLikewise, the combined managing score categories were put into a model with the following covariates: age, gender, ethnicity, income and education