Table 3.
Adjusted regression analysis (logistic, Odds Ratios) for Falls in the last 12 months, n = 1325 participants aged 60 and over
| Model | Domain | Level | OR (95% CI, P-value) | P-value | Linear trend (95%CI, P-value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model with individual domain managing countsa | Biological | No risk | Reference | < 0.01 | 1.66 (1.35 to 2.04, < 0.01) |
| Some risk | 1.34 (0.88 to 2.03, 0.17) | ||||
| High risk | 2.74 (1.83 to 4.1, < 0.01) | ||||
| Psychological | No risk | Reference | 0.043 | 1.35 (1.06 to 1.72, 0.01) | |
| Some risk | 1.53 (1.00 to 2.34, 0.05) | ||||
| High risk | 1.70 (1.00 to 2.88, 0.05) | ||||
| Social | No risk | Reference | 0.271 |
1.18
(0.97 to 1.44, 0.11) |
|
| Some risk | 1.16 (0.78 to 1.71, 0.46) | ||||
| High risk | 1.39 (0.93 to 2.06, 0.11) | ||||
| Model with managing scoresb | BioPsychoSocial | Doing well | Reference | < 0.01 | 1.86 (1.52 to 2.28, < 0.01) |
| Some problems | 1.96 (1.33 to 2.89, < 0.01) | ||||
| Many problems | 3.67 (2.33 to 5.76, < 0.01) | ||||
| Overwhelming problems | 5.37 (2.01 to 14.33, < 0.01) |
aThe individual B, P, S categories were put into the same model with the following covariates: age, gender, ethnicity, income and education
bLikewise, the combined managing score categories were put into a model with the following covariates: age, gender, ethnicity, income and education