Table 4.
Model | Domain | Level | OR (95% CI, P-value) | P-value | Linear trend (95%CI, P-value) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model with individual domain managing countsa | Biological | No risk | Reference | < 0.01 | 2.86 (2.34 to 3.49, < 0.01) |
Some risk | 1.87 (1.24 to 2.81, < 0.01) | ||||
High risk | 7.66 (5.19 to 11.29, < 0.01) | ||||
Psychological | No risk | Reference | 0.12 | 1.26 (1.00 to 1.59, 0.05) | |
Some risk | 1.43 (0.95 to 2.14, 0.09) | ||||
High risk | 1.47 (0.88 to 2.44, 0.14) | ||||
Social | No risk | Reference | < 0.01 | 1.51 (1.25 to 1.83, < 0.01) | |
Some risk | 1.82 (1.24 to 2.66, < 0.01) | ||||
High risk | 2.35 (1.59 to 3.46, < 0.01) | ||||
Model with managing scoresb | BioPsychoSocial | Doing well | Reference | < 0.01 | 2.78 (2.29 to 3.39, < 0.01) |
Some problems | 2.82 (1.93 to 4.13, < 0.01) | ||||
Many problems | 8.64 (5.62 to 13.3, < 0.01) | ||||
Overwhelming problems | 12.77 (4.95 to 32.91, < 0.01) |
aThe individual B, P, S categories were put into the same model with the following covariates: age, gender, ethnicity, income and education
bLikewise, the combined managing score categories were put into a model with the following covariates: age, gender, ethnicity, income and education