Table 5.
Model | Domain | Level | IRR (95% CI, P-value) | P-value | Linear trend (95%CI, P-value) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model with individual domain managing countsa | Biological | No risk | Reference | < 0.01 | 1.88 (1.52 to 2.32, < 0.01) |
Some risk | 1.59 (1.03 to 2.47, 0.04) | ||||
High risk | 3.45 (2.27 to 5.23, < 0.01) | ||||
Psychological | No risk | Reference | 0.351 | 1.17 (0.93 to 1.48, 0.18) | |
Some risk | 1.3 (0.87 to 1.96, 0.20) | ||||
High risk | 1.29 (0.77 to 2.16, 0.33) | ||||
Social | No risk | Reference | 0.50 | 0.99 (0.81 to 1.2, 0.89) | |
Some risk | 0.81 (0.55 to 1.19, 0.28) | ||||
High risk | 0.97 (0.66 to 1.42, 0.88) | ||||
Model with managing scoresb | Doing well | Reference | 1.67 (1.37 to 2.02, < 0.01) | ||
Some problems | 1.49 (1.01 to 2.2, 0.05) | ||||
BioPsychoSocial | Many problems | 2.47 (1.58 to 3.85, < 0.01) | < 0.01 | ||
Overwhelming problems | 5.67 (2.8 to 11.48, < 0.01) |
aThe individual B, P, S categories were put into the same model with the following covariates: age, gender, ethnicity, income and education
bLikewise, the combined managing score categories were put into a model with the following covariates: age, gender, ethnicity, income and education