Table 6.
Model | Domain | Level | IRR (95% CI, P-value) | P-value | Linear trend (95%CI, P-value) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model with individual domain managing countsa | Biological | No risk | Reference | < 0.01 | 6.02 (4.83 to 7.49, < 0.01) |
Some risk | 2.54 (1.47 to 4.4, < 0.01) | ||||
High risk | 22.59 (14.22 to 35.87, < 0.01) | ||||
Psychological | No risk | Reference | < 0.01 | 1.2 (1.06 to 1.36, < 0.01) | |
Some risk | 1.52 (1.22 to 1.89, < 0.01) | ||||
High risk | 1.28 (0.97 to 1.7, 0.08) | ||||
Social | No risk | Reference | < 0.01 | 1.06 (0.94 to 1.19, 0.31) | |
Some risk | 1.5 (1.18 to 1.91, < 0.01) | ||||
High risk | 1.19 (0.93 to 1.54, 0.17) | ||||
Model with managing scoresb | BioPsychoSocial | Doing well | Reference | < 0.01 | 2.44 (2.17 to 2.74, < 0.01) |
Some problems | 8.82 (5.44 to 14.29, < 0.01) | ||||
Many problems | 17.3 (10.61 to 28.19, < 0.01) | ||||
Overwhelming problems | 24.63 (13.41 to 45.25, < 0.01) |
aThe individual B, P, S categories were put into the same model with the following covariates: age, gender, ethnicity, income and education
bLikewise, the combined managing score categories were put into a model with the following covariates: age, gender, ethnicity, income and education