Table 2.
Actual performance and recommendations (upper rows) and perceived clinical performance and intentions to improve practice (lower rows)
All quality indicators (n = 288) | Measuring pain (n = 72) | Acceptable pain scores (n = 72) | Repeating pain measurements (n = 72) | Normalised pain scores (n = 72) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Actual performance and recommendations | |||||
Performance, median (IQR) | 41.4 (11.4–82.6) | 66.2 (55.7–83.8) | 84.9 (82.4–89.6) | 12.9 (4.6–22.2) | 9.3 (4.1–21.1) |
Top 10% peer performance, median (IQR) | 74.5 (38–92.4) | 91.2 (89.6–95.2) | 92.5 (90.8–94) | 38 (38–52.5) | 31.7 (30.8–42.3) |
Improvement recommendation | |||||
Good performance, n (%) | 71 (24.7%) | 15 (20.8%) | 40 (55.6%) | 8 (11.1%) | 8 (11.1%) |
Room for improvement, n (%) | 112 (38.9%) | 28 (38.9%) | 30 (41.7%) | 26 (36.1%) | 28 (38.9%) |
Improvement recommended, n (%) | 105 (36.5%) | 29 (40.3%) | 2 (2.8%) | 38 (52.8%) | 36 (50%) |
Perceived performance and improvement intentions | |||||
Perceived performance, median (IQR) | 70 (50–85) | 86.5 (70–95.8) | 75 (60–80) | 60 (40–80) | 60 (40–80) |
Perceived peer performance, median (IQR) | 70 (60–80) | 80 (70–85) | 75 (60–80) | 60 (50–80) | 62.5 (50–80) |
Target [before feedback], median (IQR) | 90 (80–95) | 90 (88.8–95) | 87.5 (80–95) | 90 (80–100) | 80 (75–90) |
Target [after feedback], median (IQR) | 90 (75–90) | 90 (90–95) | 90 (85–90.6) | 80 (60–90) | 70 (50–90) |
Intention to improve [before feedback], n (%) | 230 (79.9%) | 49 (68.1%) | 58 (80.6%) | 62 (86.1%) | 61 (84.7%) |
Intention to improve [after feedback], n (%) | 239 (83%) | 58 (80.6%) | 43 (59.7%) | 69 (95.8%) | 69 (95.8%) |