Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 17;13:33. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0727-8

Table 2.

Actual performance and recommendations (upper rows) and perceived clinical performance and intentions to improve practice (lower rows)

All quality indicators (n = 288) Measuring pain (n = 72) Acceptable pain scores (n = 72) Repeating pain measurements (n = 72) Normalised pain scores (n = 72)
Actual performance and recommendations
 Performance, median (IQR) 41.4 (11.4–82.6) 66.2 (55.7–83.8) 84.9 (82.4–89.6) 12.9 (4.6–22.2) 9.3 (4.1–21.1)
 Top 10% peer performance, median (IQR) 74.5 (38–92.4) 91.2 (89.6–95.2) 92.5 (90.8–94) 38 (38–52.5) 31.7 (30.8–42.3)
 Improvement recommendation
  Good performance, n (%) 71 (24.7%) 15 (20.8%) 40 (55.6%) 8 (11.1%) 8 (11.1%)
  Room for improvement, n (%) 112 (38.9%) 28 (38.9%) 30 (41.7%) 26 (36.1%) 28 (38.9%)
  Improvement recommended, n (%) 105 (36.5%) 29 (40.3%) 2 (2.8%) 38 (52.8%) 36 (50%)
Perceived performance and improvement intentions
 Perceived performance, median (IQR) 70 (50–85) 86.5 (70–95.8) 75 (60–80) 60 (40–80) 60 (40–80)
 Perceived peer performance, median (IQR) 70 (60–80) 80 (70–85) 75 (60–80) 60 (50–80) 62.5 (50–80)
 Target [before feedback], median (IQR) 90 (80–95) 90 (88.8–95) 87.5 (80–95) 90 (80–100) 80 (75–90)
 Target [after feedback], median (IQR) 90 (75–90) 90 (90–95) 90 (85–90.6) 80 (60–90) 70 (50–90)
 Intention to improve [before feedback], n (%) 230 (79.9%) 49 (68.1%) 58 (80.6%) 62 (86.1%) 61 (84.7%)
 Intention to improve [after feedback], n (%) 239 (83%) 58 (80.6%) 43 (59.7%) 69 (95.8%) 69 (95.8%)